Clasics can be found here: www.improbable.com/airchives/classical/ How to write a scientific paper: www.improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume2/v2i5/howto.htm Be sure to NOT submit it here: www.universalrejection.org/, found via: decision-making.moshe-online.com/asor_ra_2011.pdf (also quite funy) Apples and Oranges — A Comparison: www.improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume1/v1i3/air-1-3-apples.html

For som reeson i started reeding about peer review, and i ended up reeding a lot of interesting articles. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review Two quotes stand out, copyd from the Criticism section: “There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too […]

“In the “weak form,” it is a sound, harmless, and on occasion useful application of elementary logic: if x is a necessary condition for the existence of y, and y exists, then x exists. If consciousness depends on complex physical structures, and complex structures depend on large molecules composed of elements heavier than hydrogen and […]

Exerpt from Possible Worlds. It is a pees of very useful information. ——— Janus-faced sentences The method of possible-worlds testing is not only an invaluable aid towards resolving ambiguity; it is also an effective weapon against a particular form of-linguistic sophistry. Thinkers often deceive themselves and others into supposing that they have discovered a profound […]