## Some different deterministic theses

Determinism is a fairly broad thesis, and some formulations of it does not “work” with Swartz’s regularity theory. Below I have outlined some different deterministic theses. Minimal Causal Determinism (MCD): All events are caused. Necessarian Causal Determinism (NCD): “[G]iven a specified way things are at a time t, the way things go thereafter is fixed […]

## Worldviews and mistaken beliefs, a paradox

Here’s a little paradox that I’ve come across while thinking. It’s about worldviews and knowing that at least one thing I currently believe to be true is actually false. The argument 1.      For all x, if x is a belief in my worldview, then I hold that belief. [Premise] 2.      If for all x, if […]

## Meaning, propositions, category errors

I quote Swartz: “What sort of thing is my pen’s  being on my desk? We are inclined to say such things as “My pen’s being on my desk is true,” which would suggest that my pen’s being on my desk is a proposition; but we are also inclined to say such things as “My pen’s […]

## Modal logic formalization, multiple kinds of possibilities

Formatting requires a PDF file. modal-logic-formalization

## The recent controversy about Hume's Maxim against justified belief in miracles

Contrary to what I normally do I’m not going to argue anything in this article. My goal is to spread useful information, mostly in form of links about Hume’s maxim. Hume’s maxim Hume mentions this in his essay An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.[i]: 91. The plain consequence is (and it is a general maxim worthy […]

## The term non-sequitur

As Wikipedia notes,i the term is used in everyday speech to deny a conditional (if-then statement), and it is also used in logic to mean an invalid argument. This together with the fact that in normal language people do not write the complete arguments when they argue, makes it very easy to confuse things. Suppose […]

## Discussions on the internet

Intro I have a couple of thoughts related to discussing things on the internet that I want to share. These thoughts are about active networking, being effective and having the goal in mind, avoiding unproductive people etc. Realization of why one is discussing First one ought to make it clear to oneself why one is […]

## Belief, disbelief; agreement, disagreement

There is often some confusion surrounding the terms: belief, disbelief, agreement and disagreement when used in a philosophical context. We need to keep in mind that normal dictionary definitions are often not precise enough to be used in a philosophical context where precision and clarity are essential. (For analytic philosophy.) In this article I will […]

## Two kinds of certainty

A quick explanation of two types of certainty that people tend to confuse. The first is the one we typically mean in natural language. It’s called psychological certainty. It’s a feeling of certainty; A confidence in something. This is the one we’re talking about when we say things like “Are you 100% sure?”. It is […]