{"id":1265,"date":"2009-04-07T15:55:44","date_gmt":"2009-04-07T13:55:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/?p=1265"},"modified":"2009-04-07T15:55:44","modified_gmt":"2009-04-07T13:55:44","slug":"does-a-sound-lpoe-establish-that-god-is-impossible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=1265","title":{"rendered":"Does a sound LPoE establish that god is impossible?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve heard that claim, but do you think it is true? I don&#8217;t.<br \/>\nAll LPoEs (Logical Problem of Evil&#8217;s) can be seen as an inconsistent set of propositions. Here&#8217;s a really simple version:<\/p>\n<p>Simple LPoE:<br \/>\n1. God is all-good.<br \/>\n2. God is all-powerful.<br \/>\n3. God is all-knowledgeable.<br \/>\n4. If god is all-good, all-powerful and all-knowledgeable, then there is no evil.<br \/>\n5. There is evil.<\/p>\n<p>The above set of propositions is inconsistent, i.e. they cannot all be true; it is impossible that they are all true. But from the fact that a set of propositions cannot be true, it does not follow that any one of them are impossible.<\/p>\n<p>It does not follow either, that if all but one of them are true, then the last is necessarily false; impossibly true. That would be to commit a modal scope fallacy. What does follow from all but one of them being true is that the last one is false. So, there is a confusion between:<\/p>\n<p>1. If all but one of the propositions in an inconsistent set are true, then the last proposition is necessarily false.<\/p>\n<p>2. Necessarily, if all but one of the propositions in an inconsistent set are true, then the last proposition is false.<\/p>\n<p>So, given the above I don&#8217;t know why someone thinks that a sound LPoE establishes that god is  impossible. For that to work, one would need to establish that evil is necessarily and I don&#8217;t think that is feasible. After all, if evil is necessarily, it is not god&#8217;s fault that there is evil, is it?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve heard that claim, but do you think it is true? I don&#8217;t. All LPoEs (Logical Problem of Evil&#8217;s) can be seen as an inconsistent set of propositions. Here&#8217;s a really simple version: Simple LPoE: 1. God is all-good. 2. God is all-powerful. 3. God is all-knowledgeable. 4. If god is all-good, all-powerful and all-knowledgeable, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,19],"tags":[363,718,1012],"class_list":["post-1265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-modal-logik-filosofi-filosofi","category-religion-filosofi","tag-evil","tag-lpoe","tag-problem-of-evil"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1265\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}