{"id":14,"date":"2007-10-16T19:58:40","date_gmt":"2007-10-16T17:58:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/?p=14"},"modified":"2007-10-16T19:58:40","modified_gmt":"2007-10-16T17:58:40","slug":"ingen-sand-skotte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=14","title":{"rendered":"Ingen sand skotte"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ingen sand skotte<\/strong><\/p>\n

Af Emil Kirkegaard<\/em><\/p>\n

“Ingen sand skotte”-fejlslutningen er en tautologi (dvs. analytisk sandhed) forkl\u00e6dt for empirisk (syntetisk) sandhed. Et klassisk eksempel lyder s\u00e5ledes:<\/p>\n

“Ingen skotte h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d.”<\/p>\n

“Men min onkel Angus kan godt lide sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d.”<\/p>\n

“N\u00e5h ja, men ingen sand<\/em> skotte h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d”1<\/sup><\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Fejlen ligger i, at definitionen p\u00e5 ‘skotte’ ikke har noget at g\u00f8re med, om man h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d eller ej. S\u00e5ledes kommer udsagnet ovenover til at lyde s\u00e5dan:<\/p>\n

“Ingen, som ikke h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d, h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d.”<\/p>\n

Fejlslutningen bliver ofte beg\u00e5et af muslimer i deres forsvar for Islam:<\/p>\n

“Ingen muslimer beg\u00e5r terrorisme”
\n“Jeg kender da ellers til mange muslimer, som har beg\u00e5et terrorisme”
\n“Ja, men de var ikke rigtige muslimer”<\/p>\n

Som bekendt har definitionen p\u00e5 ‘muslim’ intet at g\u00f8re med, om de beg\u00e5r terrorisme eller ej. Et tredje eksempel, som er lidt mere indviklet, er fra en debat, jeg havde med en teist, som h\u00e6vdede at have haft en \u00e5benbaring som bevis for guds eksistens. Jeg p\u00e5pegede, at mange andre troende havde haft \u00e5benbaringer med deres gud(er), og at de ikke alle sammen kunne v\u00e6re rigtige. Derefter p\u00e5stod han, at de ikke var rigtige \u00e5benbaringer (dvs. falske).<\/p>\n

1<\/a>http:\/\/da.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ingen_sand_skotte<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/No_true_Scotsman<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ingen sand skotte Af Emil Kirkegaard “Ingen sand skotte”-fejlslutningen er en tautologi (dvs. analytisk sandhed) forkl\u00e6dt for empirisk (syntetisk) sandhed. Et klassisk eksempel lyder s\u00e5ledes: “Ingen skotte h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d.” “Men min onkel Angus kan godt lide sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d.” “N\u00e5h ja, men ingen sand skotte h\u00e6lder sukker p\u00e5 sin gr\u00f8d”1 Fejlen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[849,1156],"class_list":["post-14","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-epistemologi","tag-no-true-scotsman","tag-skotte"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}