{"id":2326,"date":"2011-10-27T13:28:58","date_gmt":"2011-10-27T12:28:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=2326"},"modified":"2011-10-27T13:28:58","modified_gmt":"2011-10-27T12:28:58","slug":"mht-modeksaempler-og-anderlighed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=2326","title":{"rendered":"Mht. (mod)eks\u00e6mpler og \u00e5nderlighed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jaj skr\u00e6v lige en mail tel mine to l\u00e6rere i faget Filosofisk Logik<em>. <\/em>D\u00e6n kunne nok have enteresse for andre l\u00e6sere a min blog.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>I to (Lars og JC) snakkede p\u00e5 gangen p\u00e5 et tidsp\u00e5ngkt om, at bare fordi at et eks\u00e6mpel er \u00e5nderligt, s\u00e5 f\u00f8ljer de ekke, at de er et modeks\u00e6mpel. Eks. ifht. JTB analysen a \u201dknowledge\u201d, s\u00e5 gives Gettier eks\u00e6mpler tit, og disse er \u00e5nderlige cases a at vide at P. M\u00e6n er de virkelig cases vor personen ekke ved at P, som de typisk antages? M\u00e5ske, m\u00e5ske ekke. Jaj er ekke overbevist l\u00e6ngere, m\u00e6n var de i flere \u00e5r \u00e6fter at jaj hade l\u00e6st Gettier&#8217;s <em>Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>D\u00e6r er en majet enteressant og empirisk diskusjon a s\u00e5danne cases i George Lakoff&#8217;s <em>Women, Fire, Dangerous things<\/em>. I burde nok l\u00e6se i v\u00e6rt fald del 1 a b\u00e5gen, ca. 150 sider. B\u00e5gen kan fendes h\u00e6r: <a href=\"..\/..\/en\/?p=2406\">http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/?p=2406<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Som eks\u00e6mpel, s\u00e5 n\u00e6vnes kategorien \u201dbachelor\u201d, som jo typisk defineres som \u201dunmarried male\u201d:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u201dThis idealized model, however, does not fit the world very precisely. It<\/p>\n<p>is oversimplified in its background assumptions. There are some segments<\/p>\n<p>of society where the idealized model fits reasonably well, and when an un-<\/p>\n<p>married adult man might well be called a bachelor. But the ICM does not<\/p>\n<p>fit the case of the pope or people abandoned in the jungle, like Tarzan. In<\/p>\n<p>such cases, unmarried adult males are certainly not representative mem-<\/p>\n<p>bers of the category of bachelors.\u201d (p. 70)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>B\u00e5de Tarzan og paven er bachelors per d\u00e6n normale definisjon, m\u00e6n stadig er d\u00e6r et \u00e6ller andet \u00e5nderligt ved d\u00e6m. Skulle man fra d\u00e6nne \u00e5nderlighed, i stil m\u00e6d Gettier eks\u00e6mplerne, kongkludere, at analysen a \u201dbachelor\u201d er forkert? Tvivlsomt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jaj skr\u00e6v lige en mail tel mine to l\u00e6rere i faget Filosofisk Logik. D\u00e6n kunne nok have enteresse for andre l\u00e6sere a min blog. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- I to (Lars og JC) snakkede p\u00e5 gangen p\u00e5 et tidsp\u00e5ngkt om, at bare fordi at et eks\u00e6mpel er \u00e5nderligt, s\u00e5 f\u00f8ljer de ekke, at de er et modeks\u00e6mpel. Eks. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,22],"tags":[468,629,1635,1634],"class_list":["post-2326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-logik-filosofi","category-sprog-filosofi","tag-gettier","tag-kategori","tag-lakoff","tag-modeksempel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2326"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2328,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2326\/revisions\/2328"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}