{"id":2376,"date":"2012-01-08T12:19:56","date_gmt":"2012-01-08T11:19:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=2376"},"modified":"2012-01-08T12:20:58","modified_gmt":"2012-01-08T11:20:58","slug":"ingeni%c3%b8ren-kan-uvidenhed-fremme-demokratiet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=2376","title":{"rendered":"Ingeni\u00f8ren: Kan uvidenhed fremme demokratiet?"},"content":{"rendered":"

http:\/\/ing.dk\/artikel\/125554-kan-uvidenhed-fremme-demokratiet<\/a><\/p>\n

Ig\u00e6n er de telf\u00e6ldet at sjurnalisten ekke lenkede tel kilden. Han kunne i de mendste have skr\u00e6vet titlen (artiklen udkom osse d\u00e6n 16. des\u00e6mber, ekke 15. som han skriver):<\/p>\n

Uninformed Individuals Promote Democratic Consensus in Animal Groups<\/a><\/p>\n

Science 16 December 2011: 1578-1580. [DOI:10.1126\/science.1210280]<\/p>\n

F\u00f8rst, tid tel sjov! Bem\u00e6rk:<\/p>\n

\u201dTilsatte forskerne derefter 5-10 stk. af ikke-konditionerede – alts\u00e5 ‘uinformerede’ – gyldne shinere, vandt den bl\u00e5 gruppe, og hele stimen s\u00f8gte mod den bl\u00e5 farve. Ignoranterne underst\u00f8ttede med andre ord flertallet, selvom det ikke l\u00e5 i deres natur, og effekten blev mere robust, jo flere uinformerede fisk der kom til.<\/strong>\u201d (min markereng)<\/p>\n

Pr\u00f8v at skift \u201duinformerede\u201d ud m\u00e6d \u201duniformerede\u201d (i.e. politi). \ud83d\ude00<\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

Sjurnalisten laver for st\u00e6rke konklusjoner ifht. d\u00e6n opr\u00e6ndelige artikel. Is\u00e6r er hans overs\u00e6ttelse a artiklens \u201duninformed\u201d tel \u201duvidende\u201d problematisk i d\u00e6nne kont\u00e6kst. \u201duninformed\u201d er n\u00e6mlig givet en s\u00e6rlig betydneng i artiklen:<\/p>\n

\u201dHere, we address the question of whether and, if so, under which conditions a self-interested and strongly opinionated minority can exert its influence on group movement decisions.We show that uninformed individuals (defined as those who lack a preference or are uninformed about the features on which the collective decision is being made)<\/strong> play a central role in achieving democratic consensus.\u201d (min markereng)<\/p>\n

Et b\u00e6dre ord ville have v\u00e6ret EN \u201dindifferent\u201d1<\/sup><\/a>, ov en DA overs\u00e6ttelse a de \u201dligeglad\u201d, \u00e6ller evt. \u00e5ndlade at ben\u00f8tte kun et enkelt ord: EN \u201dwithout preference\u201d ov DA \u201duden preference\u201d.<\/p>\n

Kort opsummeret, s\u00e5 viser forskerne via en mod\u00e6l ov nogle empiristiske t\u00e6sts at:<\/p>\n

Ves man har en befolkneng best\u00e5ende a et mendretal m\u00e6d en st\u00e6rk preferangse for A, og et flertal m\u00e6d en ledt svagere preferangse for B, s\u00e5 f\u00e5r mendretallet nogle gange sin vilje. Ov, ves man telf\u00f8jer endivider uden prferangse for A \u00e6ller B, s\u00e5 stiger sandsynligheden for at flertallet f\u00e5r sin vilje.<\/p>\n

De skal lige siges, at forskerne ekke s\u00e6l kan bebrajdes s\u00e6rlig majet for forvirrengen da di er rimelig ydmyge i deres konklusjon:<\/p>\n

\u201dOur work provides evidence that uninformed individuals play an important role in consensus decision-making: By enforcing equal representation of preferences in a group, they promote a democratic outcome. This provides a new understanding of how informational status influences consensus decisions and why consensus decision-making may be so widespread in nature (4). Furthermore, these results suggest<\/strong> a principle that may<\/strong> extend to self-organized decisions among human agents.\u201d (min markereng)<\/p>\n

Di kan dog bebrajdes en smule for de d\u00e5rlige ordvalg.<\/p>\n

Gr\u00e5nden tel at de ekke umiddelbart kan overf\u00f8res tel m\u00e6nneskeligt demokrati (is\u00e6r ekke som et forsvar a folks d\u00e5mhed), er at folk i demokratier ekke bare g\u00e6nerelt ekke ved n\u00e5get, di st\u00e6mmer (=har en preferangse, i mod\u00e6llen) alligev\u00e6l uden at have relevant viden <\/em>om de di har en preferangse omkr\u00e6ng. De er dette som er farligt ov mod\u00e6llen siger entet om dette telf\u00e6lde, ov de ville formentlig h\u00e6ller ekke v\u00e6re n\u00e6mt at t\u00e6ste s\u00e5dan n\u00e5get m\u00e6d fesk.<\/p>\n

Noter<\/h3>\n
\n

1<\/a>OED \t\u201dindifferent\u201d =df<\/sub> 1. Without difference of \tinclination; not inclined to prefer one person or thing to another; \tunbiased, impartial, disinterested, neutral; fair, just, even, \teven-handed. Const. to, unto (\u2020for). arch. a.I.1.a Of persons: \tesp. indifferent judge, indifferent critic, indifferent reader.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

http:\/\/ing.dk\/artikel\/125554-kan-uvidenhed-fremme-demokratiet Ig\u00e6n er de telf\u00e6ldet at sjurnalisten ekke lenkede tel kilden. Han kunne i de mendste have skr\u00e6vet titlen (artiklen udkom osse d\u00e6n 16. des\u00e6mber, ekke 15. som han skriver): Uninformed Individuals Promote Democratic Consensus in Animal Groups Science 16 December 2011: 1578-1580. [DOI:10.1126\/science.1210280] F\u00f8rst, tid tel sjov! Bem\u00e6rk: \u201dTilsatte forskerne derefter 5-10 stk. af […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1543,1594],"tags":[408,1659,1354],"class_list":["post-2376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-demokrati-politik","category-journalistik-2","tag-fisk","tag-uninformed","tag-uvidenhed"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2376"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2379,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2376\/revisions\/2379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}