{"id":253,"date":"2008-04-24T12:21:29","date_gmt":"2008-04-24T11:21:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/?p=253"},"modified":"2008-04-24T12:21:29","modified_gmt":"2008-04-24T11:21:29","slug":"den-kategoriske-fejlslutning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=253","title":{"rendered":"Den kategoriske fejlslutning"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><meta http-equiv=\"CONTENT-TYPE\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\" \/><title><\/title><meta name=\"GENERATOR\" content=\"OpenOffice.org 2.3  (Win32)\" \/><\/p>\n<style type=\"text\/css\"> \t \t<\/style>\n<p>Denne fejlslutning ses sj\u00e6ldent og er sv\u00e6r at identificere. Det er ofte udtalelser der indeholder en kategorisk fejlslutning som beskrives som meningsl\u00f8se.<\/p>\n<p>Eksempel 1:<\/p>\n<p>No belief is rationally inferred if it can be fully explained in terms of nonrational causes.<a href=\"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/wp-admin\/#sdfootnote1sym\" title=\"sdfootnote1anc\" name=\"sdfootnote1anc\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Rationelle \u00e5rsager? \u00c5rsager har ikke noget med rationalitet at g\u00f8re. Det giver ikke mening at till\u00e6gge \u00e5rsager hverken rationalitet eller irrationalitet, og derfor er dette en kategorisk fejlslutning.<\/p>\n<p>Eksempel 2:<\/p>\n<p>Ingenting er r\u00f8dt.<\/p>\n<p>Ingenting er et koncept og ikke et objekt. Koncepter kan ikke have farver, da disse er abstrakte objekter. Derfor er dette en kategorisk fejlslutning.<\/p>\n<p>Man kan identificere kategoriske fejlslutninger ved at de till\u00e6gger en ting en egenskab den ikke logisk kan have, da den tilh\u00f8rer en anden gruppe.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/wp-admin\/#sdfootnote1anc\" title=\"sdfootnote1sym\" name=\"sdfootnote1sym\">1<\/a>Blev \tfundet i &#8216;argument from reason&#8217; \t<a href=\"http:\/\/iidb.infidels.org\/vbb\/showthread.php?t=239018\">http:\/\/iidb.infidels.org\/vbb\/showthread.php?t=239018<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Denne fejlslutning ses sj\u00e6ldent og er sv\u00e6r at identificere. Det er ofte udtalelser der indeholder en kategorisk fejlslutning som beskrives som meningsl\u00f8se. Eksempel 1: No belief is rationally inferred if it can be fully explained in terms of nonrational causes.1 Rationelle \u00e5rsager? \u00c5rsager har ikke noget med rationalitet at g\u00f8re. Det giver ikke mening at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[393,630],"class_list":["post-253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-filosofi","tag-fejlslutning","tag-kategorisk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}