{"id":298,"date":"2008-05-18T04:14:11","date_gmt":"2008-05-18T03:14:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/2008\/05\/18\/intelligens-en-flere-definition\/"},"modified":"2008-05-18T04:14:11","modified_gmt":"2008-05-18T03:14:11","slug":"intelligens-en-flere-definition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=298","title":{"rendered":"Intelligens – en, flere, definition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Diskussioner som benytter sig af intelligens hjems\u00f8ges for tiden af en plage – multiple intelligence theory<\/em> (MI). Hjems\u00f8ges fort\u00e6ller om mit syn p\u00e5 den.<\/p>\n

Men, en objektiv kritik er n\u00f8dvendig for at MI-teorien kan afskrives. MI-teorien er en teori om at et menneske har mange intelligenser. MI-fortalere kan ikke blive helt enige med hinanden, men der er mindst syv intelligenser if\u00f8lge dem.<\/p>\n

I kontrast hertil er teorien om at der er en generel intelligens<\/em> (GI).<\/p>\n

Jeg definerer intelligens som evnen til at r\u00e6sonnere korrekt.<\/p>\n

Pointer<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Den \u00e5bner vejen til intelligens relativisme hvor alle er lige intelligente, blot p\u00e5 forskellige omr\u00e5der. Denne kritik er ikke st\u00e6rk, da intelligens relativisme ikke f\u00f8lger af MI-teori, men blot er muligt.<\/p>\n

2. Alle intelligens tests har en korrelation, som sj\u00e6ldent kommer under 0,6 p\u00e5 en skala fra -1 til 1. Dette antyder en generel intelligens, ikke flere intelligenser. En kritiker opsummerer:<\/p>\n

“To date there have been no published studies that offer evidence of the validity of the multiple intelligences. In 1994 Sternberg reported finding no empirical studies. In 2000 Allix reported finding no empirical validating studies, and at that time Gardner and Connell conceded that there was “little hard evidence for MI theory” (2000, p. 292). In 2004 Sternberg and Grigerenko stated that there were no validating studies for multiple intelligences, and in 2004 Gardner asserted that he would be “delighted were such evidence to accrue” (p. 214), and he admitted that “MI theory has few enthusiasts among psychometricians or others of a traditional psychological background” because they require “psychometric or experimental evidence that allows one to prove the existence of the several intelligences” (2004, p. 214).” (Waterhouse, 2006a, p. 208).<\/p>\n

3. MI-teorien redefinerer intelligens til evne. Der er ikke noget galt i re-definition per se<\/em>, men i dette tilf\u00e6lde bliver det tilsyneladende kun gjort for at passe med teorien og er s\u00e5ledes ad hoc.<\/em><\/p>\n

4. <\/strong>Nogle af ‘intelligenserne’ overlapper delvist, og fortalerne for MI-teorien kan ikke blive enige om hvor mange ‘intelligenser’ der er. Dette tyder p\u00e5, at deres holdninger ikke kommer ud fra evidens, men intuition–der er ikke styr p\u00e5 den grundl\u00e6ggende teori.<\/p>\n

Jeg finder anden og tredje kritik meget st\u00e6rk, s\u00e5ledes at der er god grund til at tro, at MI-teorien er falsk.<\/p>\n

Punkt 2 giver god grund til at tro, at GI-teorien er korrekt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Diskussioner som benytter sig af intelligens hjems\u00f8ges for tiden af en plage – multiple intelligence theory (MI). Hjems\u00f8ges fort\u00e6ller om mit syn p\u00e5 den. Men, en objektiv kritik er n\u00f8dvendig for at MI-teorien kan afskrives. MI-teorien er en teori om at et menneske har mange intelligenser. MI-fortalere kan ikke blive helt enige med hinanden, men […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[581,814],"class_list":["post-298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psykologi","tag-intelligens","tag-multiple-intelligences"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}