{"id":424,"date":"2008-08-13T13:34:42","date_gmt":"2008-08-13T11:34:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/?p=424"},"modified":"2008-08-13T13:34:42","modified_gmt":"2008-08-13T11:34:42","slug":"negativ-ateisme-og-bevisbyrden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=424","title":{"rendered":"Negativ ateisme og bevisbyrden"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Gud og prior probability<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Inspireret af <a href=\"http:\/\/iidb.infidels.org\/vbb\/showthread.php?t=249682\">denne<\/a> diskussion med is\u00e6r Dante.<\/p>\n<p>Jeg plejer generelt at skrive, at negativ ateisme&#8211;mangel p\u00e5 tro p\u00e5 gud&#8211;ikke har nogen bevisbyrde, men dette er falsk i visse situationer.<\/p>\n<p>Dante tilskriver, korrekt, gud en meget lav prior probability. Givet en lav prior probability, s\u00e5 er standard positionen med hensyn til guds eksistens positiv ateisme. Med andre ord: den doksastiske position i forhold til &#8216;gud eksisterer&#8217; er distro&#8211;tro p\u00e5 det modsatte. De andre mulige doksastiske positioner har bevisbyrden.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Negativ ateisme er ingen p\u00e5stand<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Jeg vil indr\u00f8mme at jeg selv m\u00e5ske tidligere har lavet denne p\u00e5stand. Prima facie virker negativ ateisme ikke som nogen p\u00e5stand, da det blot er mangel p\u00e5 tro p\u00e5 at gud findes. Men hvis man t\u00e6nker efter, s\u00e5 er det en p\u00e5stand, ikke om &#8220;verden&#8221; men om hvilken tro, at man har i sindet. Vi godtager denne del af p\u00e5standen p\u00e5 grund af den antagelige p\u00e5lidelighed af introspektion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gud og prior probability Inspireret af denne diskussion med is\u00e6r Dante. Jeg plejer generelt at skrive, at negativ ateisme&#8211;mangel p\u00e5 tro p\u00e5 gud&#8211;ikke har nogen bevisbyrde, men dette er falsk i visse situationer. Dante tilskriver, korrekt, gud en meget lav prior probability. Givet en lav prior probability, s\u00e5 er standard positionen med hensyn til guds [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,19],"tags":[157,489,1005],"class_list":["post-424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-epistemologi","category-religion-filosofi","tag-bevisbyrde","tag-gud","tag-prior-probability"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}