{"id":808,"date":"2008-11-20T17:41:18","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T15:41:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/?p=808"},"modified":"2008-11-20T17:41:18","modified_gmt":"2008-11-20T15:41:18","slug":"analogier","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=808","title":{"rendered":"Analogier"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- \t \t --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \t \t --><\/p>\n<p>Jeg havde oprindeligt planlagt at skrive en analyse af analogiske argumenter (eller argumenter per analogi) og argumentere for, at disse <em>i virkelig<\/em> er deduktive argumenter. I min research fandt jeg, at det tilsyneladende ikke var blevet diskuteret s\u00e6rlig meget. I et sidste h\u00e5b for at finde noget godt om emnet (som ogs\u00e5 l\u00e5 p\u00e5 nettet gratis), s\u00e5 faldt jeg over et essay om pr\u00e6cis det jeg ville skrive om.<\/p>\n<p>Efter at have l\u00e6st det, s\u00e5 er jeg nu af den modsatte holdning, at analogiske argumenter er selvst\u00e6ndige argumenter og ikke kan reduceres til et deduktivt argument med et universelt pr\u00e6mis.<\/p>\n<p>Dog er jeg ikke helt sikker endnu. M\u00e5ske kan man formulere et analogisk pr\u00e6mis som er essentielt i alle analogiske argumenter.<\/p>\n<p><strong>L\u00e6sestof<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Wikipedia om analogier:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Analogy\">http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Analogy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>SEP har ikke meget om analogier, men jeg fandt alligevel dette:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/analogy-medieval\/\">http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/analogy-medieval\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Det omtalte essay. Jeg anbefaler meget kraftigt at l\u00e6se dette, omtrent 26 sider:<\/p>\n<p>Juthe, A. (2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.hut.fi\/Opinnot\/T-93.850\/2005\/Papers\/juthe2005-analogy.pdf\">&#8220;Argument by Analogy&#8221;<\/a>, in Argumentation (2005) 19: 1-27<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jeg havde oprindeligt planlagt at skrive en analyse af analogiske argumenter (eller argumenter per analogi) og argumentere for, at disse i virkelig er deduktive argumenter. I min research fandt jeg, at det tilsyneladende ikke var blevet diskuteret s\u00e6rlig meget. I et sidste h\u00e5b for at finde noget godt om emnet (som ogs\u00e5 l\u00e5 p\u00e5 nettet [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,11],"tags":[86],"class_list":["post-808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-epistemologi","category-logik-filosofi","tag-analogi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}