{"id":836,"date":"2008-12-03T00:57:02","date_gmt":"2008-12-02T22:57:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/deleet.dk\/?p=836"},"modified":"2008-12-03T00:57:02","modified_gmt":"2008-12-02T22:57:02","slug":"xor-en-konvergent-tanke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/?p=836","title":{"rendered":"Xor, en konvergent tanke"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- \t \t --><\/p>\n<p>Nogle kender m\u00e5ske allerede til udtrykket &#8216;xor&#8217;, en logisk konnektiv. Det er klart, at den har noget at g\u00f8re med &#8216;or&#8217; <em>eller<\/em> p\u00e5 dansk &#8216;eller&#8217; (pun intended). Lad mig fort\u00e6lle tanken fra starten.<\/p>\n<p>I normalsproget er det ofte uklart om det er muligt at v\u00e6lge begge dele n\u00e5r man f\u00e5r en disjunktion at vide; p eller q. Betragt e.g. disse to eksempler:<\/p>\n<p>1. &#8220;Tag opvasken eller st\u00f8vsugningen!&#8221;, r\u00e5bte moren til hendes s\u00f8n.<\/p>\n<p>2. &#8220;Karrieren eller mig, du v\u00e6lger.&#8221; sagde konen til sin travle mand.<\/p>\n<p>Blot ved at se p\u00e5 disse to situationer s\u00e5 ved vi, at man sandsynligvis godt kan v\u00e6lge begge i (1), men ikke kan i (2). Dog er der ingen logisk mark\u00f8r der fort\u00e6ller os dette. Grunden til, at vi ved det, er at vi kan s\u00e6tte os ind i situationerne.<\/p>\n<p>Men normalsproget, i hvert fald det danske og det engelske, har en m\u00e5de at fort\u00e6lle, at man ikke kan v\u00e6lge begge dele.<\/p>\n<p>Dansk:<\/p>\n<p>Enten p eller q.<\/p>\n<p>Engelsk:<\/p>\n<p>Either p or q.<\/p>\n<p>Jeg t\u00e6nkte naturligvis, at det ville v\u00e6re smart at have et logisk udtryk p\u00e5 dette og det var da ogs\u00e5 blevet lavet, s\u00e5 jeg havde genopfundet noget allerede har opfundet. &#8216;xor&#8217; kan let defineres ud fra de allerede introducerede konnektiver i domslogikken:<\/p>\n<p>p xor q \u2194 (pvq)\u1d27\u00ac(p\u1d27q)<\/p>\n<p><strong>L\u00e6sestof<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Wikipedia om &#8216;xor&#8217;:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Xor\">http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Xor<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nogle kender m\u00e5ske allerede til udtrykket &#8216;xor&#8217;, en logisk konnektiv. Det er klart, at den har noget at g\u00f8re med &#8216;or&#8217; eller p\u00e5 dansk &#8216;eller&#8217; (pun intended). Lad mig fort\u00e6lle tanken fra starten. I normalsproget er det ofte uklart om det er muligt at v\u00e6lge begge dele n\u00e5r man f\u00e5r en disjunktion at vide; p [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[318,325,339,912,1414],"class_list":["post-836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-logik-filosofi","tag-either","tag-eller","tag-enten","tag-or","tag-xor"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/da\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}