{"id":2687,"date":"2012-01-24T17:36:50","date_gmt":"2012-01-24T16:36:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/?p=2687"},"modified":"2012-01-24T17:36:50","modified_gmt":"2012-01-24T16:36:50","slug":"mor-on-postmodernism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/2012\/01\/mor-on-postmodernism\/","title":{"rendered":"Mor on postmodernism"},"content":{"rendered":"

I stumbld upon this: http:\/\/richarddawkins.net\/articles\/823<\/a><\/p>\n

It seems lejit i.e., not a hoex.<\/p>\n

Heer is a good analysis of the wurk in kwestshon: http:\/\/www.3ammagazine.com\/3am\/bad-faith-viii\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Reeding this stuf just maeks me eeven mor want to to reed: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fashionable_Nonsense<\/a> however i kant fiend it on the net enywear. Yet!<\/p>\n

Chomsky seems to hav been spot on wen he roet or saed (perhaps, kudnt fiend a gud sors on this kwoet)<\/p>\n

“There are lots of things I don’t understand — say, the latest debates over whether neutrinos have mass or the way that Fermat’s last theorem was (apparently) proven recently. But from 50 years in this game, I have learned two things: (1) I can ask friends who work in these areas to explain it to me at a level that I can understand, and they can do so, without particular difficulty; (2) if I’m interested, I can proceed to learn more so that I will come to understand it. Now Derrida, Lacan, Lyotard, Kristeva, etc. — even Foucault, whom I knew and liked, and who was somewhat different from the rest — write things that I also don’t understand, but (1) and (2) don’t hold: no one who says they do understand can explain it to me and I haven’t a clue as to how to proceed to overcome my failures. That leaves one of two possibilities: (a) some new advance in intellectual life has been made, perhaps some sudden genetic mutation, which has created a form of “theory” that is beyond quantum theory, topology, etc., in depth and profundity; or (b) … I won’t spell it out.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I stumbld upon this: http:\/\/richarddawkins.net\/articles\/823 It seems lejit i.e., not a hoex. Heer is a good analysis of the wurk in kwestshon: http:\/\/www.3ammagazine.com\/3am\/bad-faith-viii\/ Reeding this stuf just maeks me eeven mor want to to reed: http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fashionable_Nonsense however i kant fiend it on the net enywear. Yet! Chomsky seems to hav been spot on wen he […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[859,1836,1837],"class_list":["post-2687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophy","tag-nonsense","tag-pomo","tag-postmodernism","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2687"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2688,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2687\/revisions\/2688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}