{"id":2830,"date":"2012-04-12T17:22:08","date_gmt":"2012-04-12T16:22:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/?p=2830"},"modified":"2012-04-12T17:22:08","modified_gmt":"2012-04-12T16:22:08","slug":"lit-on-poetry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/2012\/04\/lit-on-poetry\/","title":{"rendered":"\/lit\/ on poetry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OP:<\/p>\n<p>Why do authors say things through symbols? Especially people  who are good at using the English language, I mean, if they want to say  something, if they actually want to convey a specific message, then why  don\u00b4t they just say it plainly? When you use a symbol to convey a  message then people are going to interpret in all kinds of ways. People  aren\u00b4t going to be sure of what you mean. Seems rather impractical to  me. I guess it would be understandable if they thought the message would  take to long to say and people would get bored before hearing all of it  and it\u00b4s possible to sum the message up with a symbol. But when you\u00b4ve  got a whole book to say it, an entire fucking book, and you\u00b4re assuming  people will read all of it, then the length of a message becomes  irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>Anon:<\/p>\n<p>Heres how it works OP<\/p>\n<p>Authors don&#8217;t really care about the symbols  and they don&#8217;t set out to put the symbols in from the beginning they  just throw them in to give their work the illusion of depth that isn&#8217;t  really there.<\/p>\n<p>Most authors who are not also philosophers don&#8217;t  really say anything deep or important or profound with their symbols at  all because they are much too dumb. Basically they want to pretend they  are smart.<\/p>\n<p>If they had anything real to say, they would just say it.<\/p>\n<p>Me:<\/p>\n<p>This is the reason I hate poetry. If they wanted to tell me something, they should use understandable language.<\/p>\n<p>Of  course, if they just want to play around with language etc., then  poetry is fine. Just keep me out of it, don&#8217;t force me to read it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OP: Why do authors say things through symbols? Especially people who are good at using the English language, I mean, if they want to say something, if they actually want to convey a specific message, then why don\u00b4t they just say it plainly? When you use a symbol to convey a message then people are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2830"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2830\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2831,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2830\/revisions\/2831"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}