{"id":3732,"date":"2013-03-20T18:05:43","date_gmt":"2013-03-20T17:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/?p=3732"},"modified":"2013-03-20T18:05:43","modified_gmt":"2013-03-20T17:05:43","slug":"interesting-reading-on-male-adult-male-nonadult-sexual-interactions-in-a-broad-perspective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/2013\/03\/interesting-reading-on-male-adult-male-nonadult-sexual-interactions-in-a-broad-perspective\/","title":{"rendered":"Interesting reading on male adult male nonadult sexual interactions in a broad perspective"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>Rind, Bruce, and Richard Yuill. &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Rind-Bruce-and-Richard-Yuill.-Hebephilia-as-Mental-Disorder-A-Historical-Cross-Cultural-Sociological-Cross-Species-Non-Clinical-Empirical-and-Evolutionary-Review.-Archives-of-sexual-behavior-2012-1.pdf\">Hebephilia as Mental Disorder? A Historical, Cross-Cultural, Sociological, Cross-Species, Non-Clinical Empirical, and Evolutionary Review.<\/a>&#8221; <em>Archives of sexual behavior<\/em> (2012): 1-33.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Abstract <\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Blanchardetal. (2009)demonstratedthathebephiliais<br \/>\na genuine sexual preference, but then proposed,without argument<br \/>\nor evidence, that it should be designated as amental disorder in the<br \/>\nDSM-5.Aseries ofLetters-to-the-Editor criticized this proposal as<br \/>\na non sequitur. Blanchard (2009), in rebuttal, reaf\ufb01rmed his posi-<br \/>\ntion, butwithout adequately addressing some central criticisms. In<br \/>\nthisarticle,weexaminehebephilia-as-disorder infulldetail.Unlike<br \/>\nBlanchardetal.,wediscussde\ufb01nitionsofmentaldisorder,examine<br \/>\nextensive evidence from a broad range of sources, and consider<br \/>\nalternative (i.e.,non-pathological) explanations forhebephilia.We<br \/>\nemployedWake\ufb01eld\u2019s (1992b) harmful dysfunction approach to<br \/>\ndisorder, which holds that a condition only counts as a disorder<br \/>\nwhen it is a failure of a naturally selectedmechanismto function as<br \/>\ndesigned, which is harmful to the individual in the current envi-<br \/>\nronment. We also considered a harmful-for-others approach to<br \/>\ndisorder (Bru \u00a8lde, 2007). Examination of historical, cross-cultural,<br \/>\nsociological, cross-species, non-clinical empirical, and evolution-<br \/>\nary evidence and perspectives indicated that hebephilic interest is<br \/>\nan evolved capacity and hebephilic preference an expectable dis-<br \/>\ntributional variant, both of whichwere adaptively neutral or func-<br \/>\ntional, not dysfunctional, in earlier human environments. Hebe-<br \/>\nphilia\u2019s con\ufb02ict with modern society makes it an evolutionary<br \/>\nmismatch,notagenuinedisorder.Thoughitshouldnotbeclassi\ufb01ed<br \/>\nas a disorder, it could be entered in theDSM\u2019s5-code section, used<br \/>\nfor non-disordered conditions that create signi\ufb01cant problems in<br \/>\npresent-day society.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\nKeywords Hebephilia \u0002Mental disorder \u0002Harmful dysfunction \u0002 DSM-5<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rind, Bruce, and Richard Yuill. &#8220;Hebephilia as Mental Disorder? A Historical, Cross-Cultural, Sociological, Cross-Species, Non-Clinical Empirical, and Evolutionary Review.&#8221; Archives of sexual behavior (2012): 1-33. Abstract Blanchardetal. (2009)demonstratedthathebephiliais a genuine sexual preference, but then proposed,without argument or evidence, that it should be designated as amental disorder in the DSM-5.Aseries ofLetters-to-the-Editor criticized this proposal as a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1624],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolutionary-psychology","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3732"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3734,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3732\/revisions\/3734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}