{"id":3945,"date":"2013-09-03T11:18:50","date_gmt":"2013-09-03T10:18:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/?p=3945"},"modified":"2014-10-09T18:52:08","modified_gmt":"2014-10-09T17:52:08","slug":"review-who-stole-feminism-christina-sommers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/2013\/09\/review-who-stole-feminism-christina-sommers\/","title":{"rendered":"Review: Who Stole Feminism? (Christina Sommers)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Downloaded from here:<\/p>\n

http:\/\/bookos.org\/book\/943755\/f24cb0<\/a><\/p>\n

http:\/\/bookos.org\/book\/693807\/58eb83<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I came across Sommers years ago when i read her interview here: http:\/\/www.menweb.org\/paglsomm.htm<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It had this bit:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

MS. PAGLIA: Well, one of the things that got me pilloried from coast to coast was when I wrote a piece on date rape for Newsday in January of 1991. It got picked up by the wire services, and the torrent of abuse that poured in. I want women to fend for themselves. That essay that I wrote on rape begins with the line “Rape is an outrage that cannot be tolerated in civilized society.” I absolutely abhor this broadening of the idea of rape, which is an atrocity, to those things that go wrong on a date –acquaintances, you know, little things, miscommunications — on pampered elite college campuses. <\/span><\/p>\n

MS. SOMMERS: I interviewed a young women at the University of Pennsylvania who came in in a short skirt and she was in the Women’s Center, and I think she thought I was one of the sisterhood. And she said, “Oh, I just suffered a mini-rape.” And I said, “What happened?” And she said, “A boy walked by me and said, `Nice legs’.” You know? And that — and this young woman considers this a form of rape! <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

wtf<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

after having concentrated on studying the scientific side of things:<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/663088.The_Handbook_of_Evolutionary_Psychology<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/917192.Evolutionary_Psychology<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/1553512.Missing_the_Revolution<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/633128.The_Nurture_Assumption<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/5752.The_Blank_Slate<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I started reading more on the polemic and political side of things:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/130479.Fashionable_Nonsense<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/78920.Higher_Superstition<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

and now the time has come to give feminism itself a closer view. i cant say this was a pleasurable read, it was mostly disturbing. Worse, its from 1994 so who knows how bad it has become since then?! I had to give this 5 out of 5 for opening my eyes to the insanity that goes on in feminist circles. If feminism has indeed been stolen, it is time to denounce it entirely. After all, no one really wants to take away women’s civil rights anyway (except muslims and radical xtians), so there is no need for explicit equity feminism anymore.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In Revolution from Within, Gloria Steinem informs her readers that “in <\/span><\/p>\n

this country alone . . . about 150,000 females die of anorexia each year.”1 <\/span><\/p>\n

That is mor e than three times the annual numbe r of fatalities from car <\/span><\/p>\n

accidents for the total population. Steinem refers readers to anothe r fem\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

inist best-seller, Naomi Wolf s The Beauty Myth. And in Ms. Wolf s boo k <\/span><\/p>\n

one again finds the statistic, along with the author’ s outrage. “How, ” she <\/span><\/p>\n

asks, “would America react to the mass self-immolation by hunge r of its <\/span><\/p>\n

favorite sons?”2 Although “nothing justifies comparison with the Holo\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

caust,” she cannot refrain from making one anyway. “When confronted <\/span><\/p>\n

with a vast numbe r of emaciated bodies starved not by nature but by <\/span><\/p>\n

men, one mus t notice a certain resemblance.”3 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Where did Ms. Wolf get her figures? Her source is Fasting Girls: The <\/span><\/p>\n

Emergence of Anorexia Nervosa as a Modern Disease* by Joan Brumberg, a <\/span><\/p>\n

historian and former director of women’ s studies at Cornel l University. <\/span><\/p>\n

Brumberg, too, is fully aware of the political significance of the startling <\/span><\/p>\n

statistic. She point s out that the wome n wh o study eating problems “seek<\/span><\/p>\n

to demonstrate that these disorders are an inevitable consequence of a <\/span><\/p>\n

misogynistic society that demeans women.. . by objectifying their bodies.”5<\/span><\/p>\n

Professor Brumberg, in turn, attributes the figure to the American Anorexia <\/span><\/p>\n

and Bulimia Association. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I called the American Anorexia and Bulimia Association and spoke to <\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Diane Mickley, its president . “We were misquoted,” she said. In a <\/span><\/p>\n

1985 newsletter the association had referred to 150,000 to 200,000 suf\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ferers (not fatalities) of anorexia nervosa. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

What is the correct morbidity rate? Most experts are reluctant to give <\/span><\/p>\n

exact figures. On e clinician told me that of 1,400 patients she had treated <\/span><\/p>\n

in ten years, four had died\u2014al l through suicide. The National Center for <\/span><\/p>\n

Health Statistics reported 101 deaths from anorexia nervosa in 1983 and <\/span><\/p>\n

67 deaths in 1988.6 Thoma s Dun n of the Division of Vital Statistics at the <\/span><\/p>\n

National Center for Health Statistics reports that in 1991 there were 54 <\/span><\/p>\n

deaths from anorexia nervosa and no deaths from bulimia. The deaths of <\/span><\/p>\n

these young wome n are a tragedy, certainly, but in a country of one <\/span><\/p>\n

hundre d million adul t females, such number s are hardly evidence of a <\/span><\/p>\n

“holocaust.” <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yet now the false figure, supporting the view that our “sexist society” <\/span><\/p>\n

demeans wome n by objectifying their bodies, is widely accepted as true. <\/span><\/p>\n

Ann Landers repeated it in her syndicated column in Apri l 1992: “Every <\/span><\/p>\n

year, 150,000 American wome n die from complications associated with <\/span><\/p>\n

anorexia and bulimia.”7 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I sent Naomi Wol f a letter pointing out that Dr. Mickley had said she <\/span><\/p>\n

was mistaken. Wol f sent me word on February 3, 1993, that she intends <\/span><\/p>\n

to revise he r figures on anorexia in a later edition of The Beauty Myth.8 <\/span><\/p>\n

Will she actually state that the correct figure is less than one hundred per <\/span><\/p>\n

year? And wil l she correct the implications she drew from the false report? <\/span><\/p>\n

For example, wil l she revise her thesis that masses of young women are <\/span><\/p>\n

being “starved not by nature but by men” and her declaration that <\/span><\/p>\n

“women mus t claim anorexia as political damage done to us by a social <\/span><\/p>\n

order that considers our destruction insignificant.. . as Jews identify the <\/span><\/p>\n

death camps”?9 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This is the OPENING of the book. What the fuck. No wonder feminists are batshit insane if they read this and think its true.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Virginia Held, a philosophy professor at the City University of New<\/p>\n

York, reported on the feminist conviction that feminist philosopher s are<\/p>\n

the initiators of an intellectual revolution comparable to those of “Coper \u00ad<\/p>\n

nicus, Darwin, and Freud.”1 9 Indeed, as Held points out , “some feminists<\/p>\n

think the latest revolution will be even mor e profound.” According to<\/p>\n

Held, the sex\/gender system is the controlling insight of this feminist<\/p>\n

revolution. Ms. Held tells us of the impact that the discovery of the sex\/<\/p>\n

gender system has had on feminist theory: “Now that the sex\/gender<\/p>\n

system has become visible to us , we can see it everywhere.”2 0<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

One if reminded of the crackpot index: http:\/\/math.ucr.edu\/home\/baez\/crackpot.html<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201c40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on. \u201c<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Anyone reading contemporary feminist literature will find a genre of <\/span><\/p>\n

writing concerned with personal outrage. Professor Kathryn Allen Ra-<\/span><\/p>\n

buzzi of Syracuse University opens her book Motherself by recounting this <\/span><\/p>\n

incident : <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

As I was walking down a sleazy section of Second Avenue in New <\/span><\/p>\n

York City a few years ago, a voice suddenly intruded on my con\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

sciousness: “Hey Mama, spare change?” The words outraged me. . . . <\/span><\/p>\n

Although I had by then been a mothe r for many years, never till that <\/span><\/p>\n

momen t had I seen myself as “Mama” in such an impersonal , exter-<\/span><\/p>\n

nal context . In the man’ s speaking I beheld myself anew. “1 ” disap\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

peared, as though turned inside out , and “Mama” took my place.2 1 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ms. Rabuzzi informs us that the panhandler’ s term caused in her a <\/span><\/p>\n

“shocking dislocation of self.” Similarly, University of Illinois feminist <\/span><\/p>\n

theorist Sandra Lee Bartky recounts: <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It is a fine spring day, and with an utter lack of self-consciousness, <\/span><\/p>\n

I am bouncing down the street . Suddenly . . . catcalls and whistles <\/span><\/p>\n

fill the air. These noises are clearly sexual in intent and they are <\/span><\/p>\n

meant for me; they come from across the street . I freeze. As Sartre <\/span><\/p>\n

would say, I have been petrified by the gaze of the Other . My face <\/span><\/p>\n

flushes and my motions become stiff and self-conscious. The body <\/span><\/p>\n

which only a momen t before I inhabited with such ease now floods <\/span><\/p>\n

my consciousness. I have been made into an object. . . . Blissfully <\/span><\/p>\n

unaware, breasts bouncing, eyes on the birds in the trees, I could <\/span><\/p>\n

have passed by without having been turned to stone. But I mus t be <\/span><\/p>\n

made to know that I am a “nice piece of ass”: I mus t be made to see <\/span><\/p>\n

myself as they see me. There is an element of compulsion in . . . this <\/span><\/p>\n

being-made-to-be-aware of one’s own flesh: like being made to <\/span><\/p>\n

apologize, it is humiliating. . . . Wha t I describe seems less the spon\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

taneous expression of a healthy eroticism than a ritual of subjuga\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tion.2 2 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Marilyn French, the author of The War Against Women, finds herself <\/span><\/p>\n

vulnerable in museums : <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Artists appropriate the female body as their subject , thei r possession <\/span><\/p>\n

. . . assaulting female reality and autonomy. . . . Visiting galleries <\/span><\/p>\n

and museums (especially the Pompidou Center in Paris) I feel as\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

saulted by twentieth-century abstract sculpture that resembles ex\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

aggerated female body parts, mainly breasts.2 3 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

wtf am i reading<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

the sick part: THESE ARE PROFESSORS!!!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

the ultrasick part: THIS WAS BEFORE 1994! ITS WORSE TODAY<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This, for example, is wha t Professor Susan McClary, a musicologist at <\/span><\/p>\n

the University of Minnesota, tells us to listen for in Beethoven’s Ninth <\/span><\/p>\n

Symphony: “The point of recapitulation in the first movement of the <\/span><\/p>\n

Ninth is one of the mos t horrifying moment s in music, as the carefully <\/span><\/p>\n

prepared cadence is frustrated, damming u p energy which finally ex\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

plodes in the throttling, murderous rage of a rapist incapable of attaining <\/span><\/p>\n

release.”2 5 McClary also directs us to be alert to themes of male mastur \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

bation in the music of Richard Strauss and Gustav Mahler. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Seneca Falls focused on specific injustices of the kind that social policy <\/span><\/p>\n

could repair by making the laws equitable. In thinking about that first <\/span><\/p>\n

women’ s conference, it is helpful to remembe r the state of the average <\/span><\/p>\n

American woma n in the mid-nineteent h century. Consider the story of <\/span><\/p>\n

Hester Vaughan. In 1869, at the age of twenty, she had been deserted by <\/span><\/p>\n

her husband. She found work in a wealthy Philadelphia home wher e the <\/span><\/p>\n

man of the house seduced her and, when she became pregnant , fired her . <\/span><\/p>\n

In a state of terrible indigence, she gave birth alone in an unheated rented <\/span><\/p>\n

room, collapsing minutes afterward. By the time she was discovered, the <\/span><\/p>\n

baby had died. She was charged with murder . No lawyer represented her <\/span><\/p>\n

at her trial, and she was not permitted to testify. An all-male jury found <\/span><\/p>\n

her guilty, and the judge sentenced her to death. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony learned of her plight <\/span><\/p>\n

and organized a campaign to help her. On e protest meeting drew nearly <\/span><\/p>\n

a thousand women. Here is how the historian Elisabeth Griffith describes <\/span><\/p>\n

it: “They demanded a pardon for Vaughan, an end to the double standard <\/span><\/p>\n

of morality, the right of wome n to serve as jurors , and the admission of <\/span><\/p>\n

women to law schools. . . . According to Stanton, Vaughan’s trial by a <\/span><\/p>\n

jury of men . . . illustrated the indignity and injustice of women’ s legal <\/span><\/p>\n

status.”3 6 Vaughan was pardoned. More crucially, her champions and thei r suc\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

cessors went on to win for American wome n in general full equality before <\/span><\/p>\n

the law, including the right to vote, the right to hold property even in <\/span><\/p>\n

marriage, the right to divorce, and the right to equal education. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The aims of the Seneca Falls activists were clearly stated, finite, and <\/span><\/p>\n

practicable. They would eventually be realized because they were <\/span><\/p>\n

grounded in principles\u2014recognized constitutional principles\u2014tha t were <\/span><\/p>\n

squarely in the tradition of equity, fairness, and individual liberty. Stan\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ton’s reliance on the Declaration of Independenc e was not a ploy; it was <\/span><\/p>\n

a direct expression of her own sincere creed, and it was the creed of the <\/span><\/p>\n

assembled men and women. Indeed, it is worth remembering that Seneca <\/span><\/p>\n

Falls was organized by both me n and wome n and that me n actively <\/span><\/p>\n

participated in it and were welcomed.3 7 Misandrism (hostility to men, the <\/span><\/p>\n

counterpar t to misogyny) was not a notable feature of the women’ s move \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ment unti l our own times.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

dafuq, but good it got changed!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Recently several male student s at Vassar were falsely accused of date <\/span><\/p>\n

rape. After thei r innocence was established, the assistant dean of students , <\/span><\/p>\n

Catherine Comins , said of thei r ordeal : “They have a lot of pain, but it is <\/span><\/p>\n

not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally <\/span><\/p>\n

initiates a process of self-exploration. ‘How do I see women?’ ‘If I did not <\/span><\/p>\n

violate her , could I have?’ ‘Do I have the potential to do to her what they <\/span><\/p>\n

say I did?’ These are good questions.”8 Dean Comins clearly feels justified <\/span><\/p>\n

in trumping the commo n law principle “presumed innocent unti l proven <\/span><\/p>\n

guilty” by a new feminist principle, “guilty even if proven innocent.” <\/span><\/p>\n

Indeed, she believes that the student s are not really innocent after all. <\/span><\/p>\n

How so? Because, being male and being brought u p in the patriarchal <\/span><\/p>\n

culture, they could easily have done wha t they were falsely accused of <\/span><\/p>\n

having done , even though they didn’ t actually do it. Wher e men are <\/span><\/p>\n

concerned, Comins quite sincerely believes in collective guilt. Moreover, <\/span><\/p>\n

she feels she can rely on her audience to be in general agreement with <\/span><\/p>\n

her on this. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

wtf<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Does it matter that academic feminists speak of replacing seminars <\/span><\/p>\n

with “ovulars,” history with “herstory,” and theology with “thealogy”? <\/span><\/p>\n

Should it concern us that mos t teachers of women’ s studies think of <\/span><\/p>\n

knowledge as a “patriarchal construction”? It should, because twenty <\/span><\/p>\n

years ago the nation’s academies offered fewer than twenty courses in <\/span><\/p>\n

women’ s studies; today such courses numbe r in the tens of thousands . <\/span><\/p>\n

Such rapid growth, which even now shows little signs of abating, is un\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

precedented in the annal s of higher education. The feminist coloniza-<\/span><\/p>\n

tion of the American academy warrants study. Wha t is driving it? Is it a <\/span><\/p>\n

good thing? <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

u know, i thought it was a parody when critics said \u201cherstory\u201d. But it wanst!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The misplaced efforts to avoid slighting women lead quickly to exten\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

sive “re-visionings” of history, art , and the sciences. The Center for the <\/span><\/p>\n

Study of Social and Political Change at Smith College did a critical study <\/span><\/p>\n

of three of the mos t widely used new high school American history <\/span><\/p>\n

textbooks. Because of state mandates for gender equality, the author s of <\/span><\/p>\n

the new textbooks had to go out of their way to give wome n prominence. <\/span><\/p>\n

The Smith researchers were not happy with the results: <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There is one major problem .. . in writing nonsexist history text\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

books . Most of America’s history is male-dominated, in par t because <\/span><\/p>\n

in mos t states wome n were not allowed to vote in federal elections <\/span><\/p>\n

or hold office unti l the twentieth century. This may be regrettable, <\/span><\/p>\n

but it is still a fact. What , then, is a nonsexist writer of the American <\/span><\/p>\n

history textbook to do? The answer is filler feminism.1 9 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Filler feminism pads history with its own “facts” designed to drive <\/span><\/p>\n

home the lessons feminists wish to impart . The following passage from <\/span><\/p>\n

one of the mos t widely used high school American history texts, American <\/span><\/p>\n

Voices, is a good example of the sort of “feel good” feminist spin that has <\/span><\/p>\n

become the norm in our nation’s textbooks:<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A typical [Indian] family thus consisted of an old woman, her <\/span><\/p>\n

daughter s with thei r husbands and children, and her unmarried <\/span><\/p>\n

granddaughter s and grandsons . . . . Politically, women’ s roles and <\/span><\/p>\n

status varied from culture to culture. Wome n were mor e likely to <\/span><\/p>\n

assume leadership roles among the agricultural peoples than among <\/span><\/p>\n

nomadi c hunters . In addition, in many cases in which women did <\/span><\/p>\n

not become village chiefs, they still exercised substantial political <\/span><\/p>\n

power . For example, in Iroquois villages, when selected men sat in <\/span><\/p>\n

a circle to discuss and make decisions, the senior women of the <\/span><\/p>\n

village stood behind them, lobbying and instructing the men. In <\/span><\/p>\n

addition, the elder wome n named the male village chiefs to their <\/span><\/p>\n

positions.2 0 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Though some of the information about the Iroquois is vaguely correct , <\/span><\/p>\n

the paragraph is blatantly designed to give high school student s the <\/span><\/p>\n

impression that mos t Native American societies tended to be politically <\/span><\/p>\n

matriarchal . Since that is not true, the textbook “covers” itself by the <\/span><\/p>\n

formal disclaimer that “in many cases .. . the wome n did not become <\/span><\/p>\n

village chiefs.” (In how many cases? A smal l minority? A large majority?) <\/span><\/p>\n

This is patronizing to both Indians and women , and there is no basis for <\/span><\/p>\n

it. There are mor e than 350 recognized Indian tribes\u2014one can n o mor e <\/span><\/p>\n

generalize about them than one can about “humanity. ” Here is wha t <\/span><\/p>\n

Gilbert Sewall of the American Textbook Counci l says about this passage: <\/span><\/p>\n

“Female-headed households? Bad old history may cede to bad new his\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tory. The presentist spin on Indian society found in the American Voices <\/span><\/p>\n

passage is less versed in evidence than aligned to contemporary feminist <\/span><\/p>\n

politics and perspectives.”2 1 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I think the EU recently tried something like this as well, but i cant find the ref.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The problem of “filler feminism” will get worse. Transformationists are <\/span><\/p>\n

wel l organized, and thei r influence is growing apace. Because of transfor\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

mationist pressures , the law in some states now actually mandates “gen\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

der-fair” history. The California State Department of Education has issued <\/span><\/p>\n

guidelines called “Standards for Evaluation of Instructional Materials with <\/span><\/p>\n

Respect to Social Content. ” According to Education Code section <\/span><\/p>\n

60040(a) and 60044(a) , “Whenever an instructional material presents <\/span><\/p>\n

development s in history or current events, or achievements in art, science, <\/span><\/p>\n

or any other field, the contributions of wome n and men should be rep\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

resented in approximately equal number.”2 6 In effect, this law demands <\/span><\/p>\n

that the historian be mor e attentive to the demands of “equal representa\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tion” than to the historical facts. Needless to say, histories and social <\/span><\/p>\n

studies presented in this “fair” but factually skewed manne r constitute an <\/span><\/p>\n

unworthy and dishones t approach to learning. <\/span><\/p>\n

In the history of the high arts the absence of wome n is deplorable but <\/span><\/p>\n

largely irreparable. Few wome n in the past were allowed to train and <\/span><\/p>\n

work in the major arts. Because of this, me n have wrought mos t of the <\/span><\/p>\n

works that are commonly recognized as masterpieces. But here, espe\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

cially, the temptation to redress past wrongs through “reconceptualiza-<\/span><\/p>\n

tion” has proved irresistible. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In their critique of the imperial male culture, the transformationist <\/span><\/p>\n

feminists do not confine themselves to impugning the history, art , an d <\/span><\/p>\n

literature of the past . They also regard logic and rationality as “phallocen-<\/span><\/p>\n

tric.” Elizabeth Minnich traces the cultural tradition to a “few privileged <\/span><\/p>\n

males . . . wh o are usually called ‘The Greeks. ‘ “3 4 In common with many <\/span><\/p>\n

other transformationists, Minnich believes that the conceptions of ratio\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

nality and intelligence are white, male creations: “At present . . . not only <\/span><\/p>\n

are student s taught ‘phallocentric’ and ‘colonial ‘ notions of reason as the <\/span><\/p>\n

forms of rational expression, but the full possible range of expression of <\/span><\/p>\n

huma n intelligence also tends to be forced into a severely shrunken no –<\/span><\/p>\n

tion of intelligence.”3 5 Note the reference to a “colonial” rationality with <\/span><\/p>\n

its implication of deliberate subjugation. It is now commo n practice to <\/span><\/p>\n

use scare quotes to indicate the feminist suspicion of a “reality” peculiar <\/span><\/p>\n

to male ways of knowing. For example, the feminist philosopher Joyce <\/span><\/p>\n

Trebilcot speaks of “the apparatuses of ‘truth, ‘ ‘knowledge, ‘ ‘science, ‘ ” <\/span><\/p>\n

that men use to “project their personalities as reality.”3 6 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The attack on traditional culture has thus escalated to an attack on the <\/span><\/p>\n

rational standards and methods that have been the hallmark of scientific <\/span><\/p>\n

progress. The New Jersey Project for reforming the public schools circu\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

lates a document entitled “Feminist Scholarship Guidelines.” The first <\/span><\/p>\n

guideline is unexceptionable: “Feminist scholars seek to recover the lost <\/span><\/p>\n

work and thought of wome n in all areas of huma n endeavor.”3 7 But after <\/span><\/p>\n

that , the guidelines unravel : “Feminist scholarship begins with an aware\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ness that muc h previous scholarship has offered a white, male, Eurocen\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tric, heterosexist , and elite view of’reality. ‘ ” <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The guidelines elaborate on the attitude toward masculinist scholarship <\/span><\/p>\n

and methods by quoting the feminist theorist Elizabeth Fee: “Knowledge <\/span><\/p>\n

was created as an act of aggression\u2014a passive nature had to be interro\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

gated, unclothed, penetrated, and compelled by ma n to reveal her se\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

crets.” Fee’s resentment and suspicion of male “ways of knowing” follows <\/span><\/p>\n

a path wel l trodden by such feminist thinkers as Mary Ellman, Catharine <\/span><\/p>\n

MacKinnon, and Sandra Harding, whose views of patriarchal knowledge <\/span><\/p>\n

and science have quickly become central gender feminist doctrine. Play\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ing on the biblical double meaning of knowing to refer both to intercourse <\/span><\/p>\n

and to cognition, Ellman and MacKinnon claim that men approach nature <\/span><\/p>\n

as rapists approach a woman , taking joy in violating “her,” in “penetrat \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ing” her secrets. Feminists, says MacKinnon, have finally realized that for <\/span><\/p>\n

men, “to know has meant to fuck.”3 8 In a similar mood, Sandra Harding <\/span><\/p>\n

suggests that Newton’ s Principles of Mechanics could jus t as aptly be <\/span><\/p>\n

called “Newton’ s Rape Manual.”<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

omg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Male scholars specializing in their masculinist academic disciplines <\/span><\/p>\n

(from chemistry to philosophy) are known to transformationists as “sep\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

arate knowers. ” The author s of Women’s Ways oj Knowing, a text muc h <\/span><\/p>\n

cited by transformationists, define “separate knowing” as “the game of <\/span><\/p>\n

impersonal reason,” a game that has “belonged traditionally to boys.”4 0 <\/span><\/p>\n

“Separate knower s are tough-minded. They are like doormen at exclusive <\/span><\/p>\n

clubs. They do not want to let anything in unless they are pretty sure it is <\/span><\/p>\n

good. . . . Presented with a proposition, separate knower s immediately <\/span><\/p>\n

look for something wrong\u2014a loophole, a factual error, a logical contra\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

diction, the omission of contrary evidence.”4 1 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Separate knowers\u2014mainly men\u2014pla y the “doubting game. ” The au\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

thors of Women’s Ways of Knowing contrast separate knowing with a <\/span><\/p>\n

higher state of “connected knowing” that they view as the mor e feminine. <\/span><\/p>\n

In place of the “doubting game,” connected knower s play the “believing <\/span><\/p>\n

game.” This is more congenial for wome n because “many women find it <\/span><\/p>\n

easier to believe than to doubt.”4 2 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

not science!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Linda Gardiner , editor of the Women’s Review of Books, which is housed <\/span><\/p>\n

in the Wellesley College Center for Research on Women , wonder s <\/span><\/p>\n

whether Western philosophy speaks for wome n at all. “We might begin <\/span><\/p>\n

to question the impor t of Descartes’ stress on logic and mathematics as <\/span><\/p>\n

the ideal types of rationality, in a society in which only a tiny percentage <\/span><\/p>\n

of people could realistically spend time developing skills in those fields,” <\/span><\/p>\n

she writes.5 9 Noting that the philosophical elite is biased in favor of the <\/span><\/p>\n

abstract , methodical , and universal , Gardiner suggests that a feminist <\/span><\/p>\n

philosophy would be mor e concrete and mor e suspicious of logic and <\/span><\/p>\n

method. “What would a female logic be like?” she asks, and answer s that <\/span><\/p>\n

this would be like asking wha t female astronomy or particle physics <\/span><\/p>\n

would be like. “We cannot imagine wha t it would mean to have a ‘female <\/span><\/p>\n

version’ of them.”6 0 For that , says Ms. Gardiner , we should first need to <\/span><\/p>\n

develop different epistemologies. Reading Gardiner’s spirited argument s <\/span><\/p>\n

for the thesis that classical philosophy is essentially and inveterately male <\/span><\/p>\n

biased, one cannot avoid the impression that the feminist critic is mor e <\/span><\/p>\n

ingenious at finding male bias in a field than in proposing an intelligible <\/span><\/p>\n

alternative way to deal with its subject matter . <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Reminds me of: http:\/\/old.richarddawkins.net\/articles\/823-is-this-another-sokal-hoax<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

“You can buy any number of books on ‘quantum healing’, not to mention quantum psychology, quantum responsibility, quantum morality, quantum aesthetics, quantum immortality and quantum theology. I haven’t found a book on quantum feminism, quantum financial management or Afro-quantum theory, but give it time.”
\n– Richard Dawkins, A Devil’s Chaplain (Page 147)<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Just replace \u201cquantum\u201d by \u201dfeminist\u201d and u apparently can<\/em> get \u201cfeminist particle physics\u201d \u201cfeminist astronomy\u201d and \u201cfeminist logic\u201d.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

What the fuck am i reading<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Feminist critics have looked at the metaphor s of “male science” and <\/span><\/p>\n

found them sexist. I recently heard a feminist astronomer interviewed on <\/span><\/p>\n

CNN say in all seriousness that sexist terminology like “the Big Bang <\/span><\/p>\n

Theory” is “off-putting to young women ” wh o might otherwise be inter\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ested in pursuing careers in her field.64 It is hard to believe that anyone <\/span><\/p>\n

with an intelligent interest in astronomy would be pu t off by a graphic <\/span><\/p>\n

description of a cosmic event . Othe r critiques of science as masculinist <\/span><\/p>\n

are equally fatuous and scientifically fruitless. After asserting that “the <\/span><\/p>\n

warlike terminology of immunology which focuses on ‘competition, ‘ ‘in\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

hibition, ‘ and ‘invasion’ as major theories of how cells interact reflects a <\/span><\/p>\n

militaristic view of the world, ” Sue Rosser, wh o offers workshops on how <\/span><\/p>\n

to transform the biology curriculum, concedes that “a feminist critique <\/span><\/p>\n

has not yet produced theoretical changes in the area of cell biology.”6 5 <\/span><\/p>\n

She does not tell us how the “feminist critique” could lead to advances in <\/span><\/p>\n

biology, but she considers it obvious that it must : “It becomes evident <\/span><\/p>\n

that the inclusion of a feminist perspective leads to changes in models, <\/span><\/p>\n

experimental subjects, and interpretations of the data. These changes <\/span><\/p>\n

entai l mor e inclusive, enriched theories compared to the traditional , re\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

strictive, unicausal theories.”6 6 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yet although the transformationists have every reason to celebrate thei r <\/span><\/p>\n

many successes, they have recently experienced a setback from an unex\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

pected quarter . Whe n Mcintosh, Minnich, and thei r followers demande d <\/span><\/p>\n

that the oppressive European, white, male culture being taught in the <\/span><\/p>\n

schools be radically transformed, they had not imagined that anyone <\/span><\/p>\n

could look upo n them as oppressors. The transformationist leaders are <\/span><\/p>\n

not men, but they are white, they are “European,” they are middle-class. <\/span><\/p>\n

Minority wome n have begun to deny that the leaders of the women’ s <\/span><\/p>\n

movement have any right to speak for them. Most member s of the wome n <\/span><\/p>\n

of color caucus boycotted the 1992 Austin National Women’ s Studies <\/span><\/p>\n

Conference I attended for its failure to recognize and respect their political <\/span><\/p>\n

identity. The slighted group sent the conferees an African-American wom\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

en’s quil t made from dashiki fabrics, as both a reprimand and a “healing <\/span><\/p>\n

gesture.” The assembled white feminists sat before it in resentful but <\/span><\/p>\n

guilty silence. In the game of moral one-upmanship that gender feminists <\/span><\/p>\n

are so good at, they had been outquilted, as it were, by a mor e marginal \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ized constituency. Clearly any number of minority groups can play the <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

victimology game, and almost all could play it far mor e plausibly than <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

the socially well-positioned Heilbruns, Mclntoshes, and Minniches.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Hahahahaha! Pwned at their own game.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Women: A Feminist Perspective is said to be the best-selling women’ s <\/span><\/p>\n

studies textbook of all time. The first selection, “Sexual Terrorism” by <\/span><\/p>\n

Carole J. Sheffield, is a good example of how the feminist classroom can <\/span><\/p>\n

“infuse” anxiety and rage. Ms. Sheffield describes an “ordinary” event that <\/span><\/p>\n

took place early one evening whe n she was alone in a Laundromat : “The <\/span><\/p>\n

laundroma t was brightly lit; and my car was the only one in the lot. <\/span><\/p>\n

Anyone passing by could readily see that I was alone and isolated. Know\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ing that rape is a crime of opportunity, I became terrified.” Ms. Sheffield <\/span><\/p>\n

left her laundry in the washer and dashed back to her car, sitting in it <\/span><\/p>\n

with the door s locked and the windows up. “When the wash was com\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

pleted, I dashed in, threw the clothes into the drier, and ran back out to <\/span><\/p>\n

my car. Whe n the clothes were dry, I tossed them recklessly into the <\/span><\/p>\n

basket and hurriedly drove away to fold them in the security of my home. <\/span><\/p>\n

Although I was not victimized in a direct , physical way or by objective or <\/span><\/p>\n

measurable standards , I felt victimized. It was, for me, a terrifying expe\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

rience.” At home , her terror subsides and turns to anger: “Mostly I was <\/span><\/p>\n

angry at being unfree: a hostage of a culture that , for the mos t part , <\/span><\/p>\n

encourages violence against females, instructs men in the methodology of <\/span><\/p>\n

sexual violence, and provides them with ready justification for their vio\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

lence. . . . Following my experience at the Laundromat , I talked with my <\/span><\/p>\n

student s about terrorization.”<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

-_-<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

For the pas t few years I have reviewed hundreds of syllabi from wom\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

en’s studies courses, attended mor e feminist conferences than I care to <\/span><\/p>\n

remember , studied the new “feminist pedagogy,” reviewed dozens of <\/span><\/p>\n

texts, journals , newsletters, and done a lot of late-into-the-night reading <\/span><\/p>\n

of e-mai l letters that thousands of “networked” women’ s studies teachers <\/span><\/p>\n

send to one another . I have taught feminist theory. I have debated gender <\/span><\/p>\n

feminists on college campuses around the country, and on national tele\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

vision an d radio. My experience with academic feminism and my immer \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

sion in the ever-growing gender feminist literature have served to deepen <\/span><\/p>\n

my conviction that the majority of women’ s studies classes and other <\/span><\/p>\n

classes that teach a “reconceptualized” subject matter are unscholarly, <\/span><\/p>\n

intolerant of dissent , and full of gimmicks. In other words , they are a <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

waste of time. And although they attract female student s because of their <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

social ambience, they attract almost no men. They divert the energies of <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

students\u2014especially young women\u2014wh o sorely need to be learning <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

how to live in a world that demand s of them applicable talents and skills, <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

not feminist fervor or ideological rectitude. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In other words, a feminist argument for why feminism as a field is bad.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The feminist classroom does little to prepare student s to cope in the <\/span><\/p>\n

world of work and culture. It is an embarrassing scandal that , in the name<\/span><\/p>\n

of feminism, young wome n in our colleges and universities are taking <\/span><\/p>\n

courses in feminist classrooms that subject them to a lot of bad prose, <\/span><\/p>\n

psychobabble, and “new age” nonsense. Wha t has real feminism to do <\/span><\/p>\n

with sitting around in circles and talking about our feelings on menstrua\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tion? To use a phrase muc h used by resenter feminists, the feminist <\/span><\/p>\n

classroom shortchanges wome n students . It wastes their time and gives <\/span><\/p>\n

them bad intellectual habits. It isolates them, socially and academically. <\/span><\/p>\n

While male student s are off studying such “vertical” subjects as engineer \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ing and biology, wome n in feminist classrooms are sitting around being <\/span><\/p>\n

“safe” and “honoring” feelings. In this way, gender feminist pedagogy <\/span><\/p>\n

plays into old sexist stereotypes that extol women’ s capacity for intuition, <\/span><\/p>\n

emotion, and empathy while denigrating their capacity to think objec\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tively and systematically in the way me n can. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A parent should think very carefully before sending a daughter to one <\/span><\/p>\n

of the mor e gender-feminized colleges. Any school has the freedom to <\/span><\/p>\n

transform itself into a feminist bastion, but because the effect on the <\/span><\/p>\n

students is so powerful it ought to be hones t about its attitude. I would <\/span><\/p>\n

like to see Wellesley College, Mount Holyoke, Smith, Mills, and the <\/span><\/p>\n

University of Minnesota\u2014among the mor e extreme examples\u2014print the <\/span><\/p>\n

following announcement on the first page of their bulletins: <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

We wil l help your daughter discover the extent to which she has <\/span><\/p>\n

been in complicity with the patriarchy. We will encourage her to <\/span><\/p>\n

reconstruct herself through dialogue with us. She may become en\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

raged and chronically offended. She will very likely reject the reli\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

gious and moral codes you raised her with. She may wel l distance <\/span><\/p>\n

herself from family and friends. She may change her appearance, <\/span><\/p>\n

and even her sexual orientation. She may end u p hating you (her <\/span><\/p>\n

father) and pitying you (her mother) . After she has completed her <\/span><\/p>\n

reeducation with us , you will certainly be out tens of thousands of <\/span><\/p>\n

dollars and very possibly be out one daughter as well . <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

At the Austin conference, my sister and I attended a packed worksho p <\/span><\/p>\n

called “White Male Hostility in the Feminist Classroom,” led by two <\/span><\/p>\n

female assistant professors from the State University of New York at <\/span><\/p>\n

Plattsburgh. What to do about young me n wh o refuse to use gender –<\/span><\/p>\n

neutral pronouns? Most agreed that the instructor should grade them <\/span><\/p>\n

down. One of the Plattsburghers told us about a male student wh o had <\/span><\/p>\n

“baited her” whe n she had defended a fifteen-year-old’s right to have an <\/span><\/p>\n

abortion without parental consent . The student had asked, “What about<\/span><\/p>\n

a 15-year-old that wanted to marry a 30-year-old?” She referred to this as <\/span><\/p>\n

a “trap.” In philosophy, it is known as a legitimate counterexample to be <\/span><\/p>\n

treated seriously and deal t with by counterargument . But she wanted to <\/span><\/p>\n

know wha t advice we had to offer. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Haha, well played! If 15 year olds are to have the freedom to get abortions, why shud they not likewise get the freedom to date much older men? Which is the more dangerous?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The claim that all teaching is a form of indoctrination, usually in the <\/span><\/p>\n

service of those wh o are politically dominant , helps to justify the peda\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

gogy of the feminist classroom. Feminist academics often say that apar t <\/span><\/p>\n

from the enclave of women’ s studies, the university curriculum consists <\/span><\/p>\n

of “men’ s studies.” They mean by this that mos t of what student s normally <\/span><\/p>\n

learn is designed to maintain and reinforce the existing patriarchy. To <\/span><\/p>\n

anyone wh o actually believes this, combatting the standard indoctrination <\/span><\/p>\n

with a feminist “counter-indoctrination” seems only fair and sensible. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The British philosopher Roger Scruton, aided by two colleagues at the <\/span><\/p>\n

Education Research Center in England, has pointed to several prominent <\/span><\/p>\n

features that distinguish indoctrination from normal education.1 8 In a <\/span><\/p>\n

competent , well-designed course, student s learn methods for weighing <\/span><\/p>\n

evidence and critical methods for evaluating argument s for soundness . <\/span><\/p>\n

They learn how to arrive at reasoned conclusions from the best evidence <\/span><\/p>\n

at hand. By contrast , in cases of indoctrination, the conclusions are as\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

sumed beforehand. Scruton calls this feature of indoctrination the “Fore\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

gone Conclusion.” According to Scruton, the adoption of a foregone <\/span><\/p>\n

conclusion is the mos t salient feature of indoctrination. In the case of <\/span><\/p>\n

gender feminism, the “foregone conclusion” is that American men strive <\/span><\/p>\n

to keep wome n subjugated. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

http:\/\/zerobs.net\/media\/science_vs_creationism-2.png<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In December 1989 I received a phon e call from a ma n wh o told me he<\/p>\n

was a graduate student at the University of Minnesota. He asked me to<\/p>\n

look into some “frightening” things campus feminists were u p to. He<\/p>\n

mentioned the Scandinavian studies department . He told me he did not<\/p>\n

want to give me his name because he felt he would be hurt : “They are<\/p>\n

powerful , they are organized, and they are vindictive.”<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Having heard “both sides” of the feminist question at Minnesota, I felt <\/span><\/p>\n

ready to tackle the mystery of the Scandinavian studies department . It <\/span><\/p>\n

turned out not to be a mystery at all\u2014only a disturbing example of <\/span><\/p>\n

extreme feminist vigilance. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

On Apri l 12, 1989, four female graduate student s filed sexual harass\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

men t charges against all six tenured member s of the Scandinavian studies <\/span><\/p>\n

department (five me n and one woman) . The professors were called to <\/span><\/p>\n

Dean Fred Lukerman’ s office, notified of the charges and, according to <\/span><\/p>\n

the accused, told they’d better get themselves lawyers. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In a letter sent to Professor William Mischler of Scandinavian studies, <\/span><\/p>\n

Ms. Patricia Mullen, the university officer for sexual harassment , informed <\/span><\/p>\n

Mischler that he had been accused of sexual harassment and would be <\/span><\/p>\n

reported to the provos t unless he responded within ten days. Similar <\/span><\/p>\n

letters were sent to the other five professors. Mischler’s letters contained <\/span><\/p>\n

no specific facts that could be remotely considered to describe sexual <\/span><\/p>\n

harassment . Whe n Mischler made further inquiries, he discovered he had <\/span><\/p>\n

been accused of giving a narrow and “patriarchal” interpretation of Isaak <\/span><\/p>\n

Dinesen’s work, of not having read a novel a student deemed important , <\/span><\/p>\n

and of having greeted a student in a less than friendly manner . Two of <\/span><\/p>\n

Mischler’s colleagues were accused of harassing the plaintiffs by not hav\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ing given them higher grades. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The plaintiffs had drawn u p a list of punitive demands , among them: <\/span><\/p>\n

1. the denial of meri t pay for a period of not less than five years; <\/span><\/p>\n

2. monthly sexual harassment workshops for all Scandinavian core <\/span><\/p>\n

faculty for at least twelve months ; and <\/span><\/p>\n

3. annual sexual harassment workshops for all Scandinavian core fac\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ulty, adjunct faculty, visiting faculty, graduate assistants, reader –<\/span><\/p>\n

graders, and graduate students . <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Lacking any suppor t from the administration whatsoever , the profes\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

sors were forced to seek legal counsel . On October 13, six month s later, <\/span><\/p>\n

all charges against four of the accused were dropped. No explanation was <\/span><\/p>\n

offered. A few month s later, the charges against the remaining two were <\/span><\/p>\n

dropped, again without explanation. All of them are still shaken from <\/span><\/p>\n

what they describe as a Kafkaesque ordeal . “When I saw the charges,” <\/span><\/p>\n

says Professor Allen Simpson, “I panicked. It’s the mos t terrifying <\/span><\/p>\n

thing . . . they want me fired. It cost me two thousand dollars to have my <\/span><\/p>\n

response drafted. I can’ t afford justice.” <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Professor Mischler requested that the contents of the complaint s be <\/span><\/p>\n

made public to the Minnesota community. But, according to the Minne\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

sota Daily, Patricia Mullen opposed disclosure on the grounds that “it <\/span><\/p>\n

would dampe n people from coming forward.”4 5 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

My efforts to reach someone wh o could give me the administration’s <\/span><\/p>\n

side of the story were not successful. Ms. Mullen declined to speak with <\/span><\/p>\n

me. Fred Lukerman, wh o was dean of the College of Liberal Arts at the <\/span><\/p>\n

time, also proved to be inaccessible. I finally did talk to a dean wh o <\/span><\/p>\n

assured me he was very supportive of feminist causes on campus , but that <\/span><\/p>\n

he believed the Scandinavian studies affair was indeed a “witch hunt. ” <\/span><\/p>\n

“But please do not use my name, ” he implored. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In math, at least, it appear s that the vaunted correlation between self-<\/span><\/p>\n

esteem and achievement does not hold. Instead of a bill called “Gender <\/span><\/p>\n

Equity in Education,” we need a bill called “Commo n Sense in Educa\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tion,” which would oversee the way the government spends money on <\/span><\/p>\n

phony education issues. The measure would not need a very big budget , <\/span><\/p>\n

but it could save millions by cutting out unneeded projects like the ones <\/span><\/p>\n

proposed for raising self-esteem and force us instead to address directly <\/span><\/p>\n

the very real problems we mus t solve if we are to give our student s the <\/span><\/p>\n

academic competence they need and to which they are entitled. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Paglia’s dismissal of date rape hype infuriates campus feminists, for <\/span><\/p>\n

whom the rape crisis is very real. On mos t campuses, date-rape groups <\/span><\/p>\n

hold meetings, marches , rallies. Victims are “survivors,” and their friends <\/span><\/p>\n

are “co-survivors” wh o also suffer and need counseling.4 1 At some rape <\/span><\/p>\n

awareness meetings , wome n wh o have not yet been date raped are re\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ferred to as “potential survivors.” Thei r male classmates are “potential <\/span><\/p>\n

rapists.”4 2 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

ffs<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In The Morning After, Katie Roiphe describes the elaborate measures <\/span><\/p>\n

taken to prevent sexual assaults at Princeton. Blue lights have been in\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

stalled around the campus , freshman wome n are issued whistles at ori\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

entation. There are marches , rape counseling sessions, emergency <\/span><\/p>\n

telephones. But as Roiphe tells it, Princeton is a very safe town, and <\/span><\/p>\n

whenever she walked across a deserted golf course to get to classes, she <\/span><\/p>\n

was mor e afraid of the wild geese than of a rapist . Roiphe reports that <\/span><\/p>\n

between 1982 and 1993 only two rapes were reported to the campus <\/span><\/p>\n

police. And, whe n it comes to violent attacks in general , male student s <\/span><\/p>\n

are actually mor e likely to be the victims. Roiphe sees the campus rape <\/span><\/p>\n

crisis movement as a phenomeno n of privilege: these young wome n have <\/span><\/p>\n

had it all, and whe n they find out that the world can be dangerous and <\/span><\/p>\n

unpredictable, they are outraged: <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Othe r critics, such as Camille Paglia and Berkeley professor of social <\/span><\/p>\n

welfare Nei l Gilbert , have been targeted for demonstrations, boycotts, and <\/span><\/p>\n

denunciations . Gilbert began to publish his critical analyses of the Ms.\/ <\/span><\/p>\n

Koss study in 1990.5 7 Many feminist activists did not look kindly on <\/span><\/p>\n

Gilbert’s challenge to thei r “one in four” figure. A date rape clearinghouse <\/span><\/p>\n

in San Francisco devotes itself to “refuting” Gilbert ; it sends out masses <\/span><\/p>\n

of literature attacking him. It advertises at feminist conferences with green <\/span><\/p>\n

and orange fliers bearing the headline STOP IT, BITCH! The words are not <\/span><\/p>\n

Gilbert’s, but the tactic is an effective way of drawing attention to his <\/span><\/p>\n

work. At one demonstration against Gilbert on the Berkeley campus , <\/span><\/p>\n

student s chanted, “Cut it out or cut it off,” and carried signs that read, <\/span><\/p>\n

KILL NEIL GILBERT! 5 8 Sheila Kuehl , the director of the California Women’ s <\/span><\/p>\n

Law Center , confided to readers of the Los Angeles Daily Journal, “I found <\/span><\/p>\n

myself wishing that Gilbert , himself, might be raped and .. . be told, to <\/span><\/p>\n

his face, it had never happened.”<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

That’s so extreme it probably was illegal.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Betty Friedan once told Simone de Beauvoir that she believed women <\/span><\/p>\n

should have the choice to stay home to raise their children if that is what <\/span><\/p>\n

they wish to do. Beauvoir answered: “No, we don’ t believe that any <\/span><\/p>\n

woma n should have this choice. No woma n should be authorized to stay<\/span><\/p>\n

at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Wome n <\/span><\/p>\n

should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, <\/span><\/p>\n

too many wome n will make that one.”4 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The totalitarianism shines thru once again.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I can’ t help being amused by how upset the New Feminists get over <\/span><\/p>\n

the vicarious pleasure wome n take in Scarlett’s transports. All that incor\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

rect swooning! How are we ever going to get wome n to see how wrong it <\/span><\/p>\n

is? Nevertheless, the gender feminists seem to believe that thirty years <\/span><\/p>\n

from now, with the academy transformed and the feminist consciousness <\/span><\/p>\n

of the population raised, there will be a new Zeitgeist. Wome n who <\/span><\/p>\n

interpret sexual domination as pleasurable will then be few and far be\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

tween, and Scarlett, alas, will be out of style. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Is this scenario out of the question? I think it is. Sexuality has always <\/span><\/p>\n

been par t of our natures , and there is no one right way. Men like Rhet t <\/span><\/p>\n

Butler wil l continue to fascinate many women. Nor will the doctrine that <\/span><\/p>\n

this demeans them have muc h of an effect. How many women who like <\/span><\/p>\n

Rhet t Butler-type s are in search of suppor t groups to help them change? <\/span><\/p>\n

Such wome n are not grateful to the gender feminists for going to war <\/span><\/p>\n

against male lust . They may even be offended at the suggestion that they <\/span><\/p>\n

themselves are being degraded and humiliated; for that treats their enjoy\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ment as pathological . <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

–<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

So far, the efforts to get wome n to overhaul their fantasies and desires <\/span><\/p>\n

have been noncoercive, but they do not seem to have been particularly <\/span><\/p>\n

effective. To get the results they want , the gender feminists have turned <\/span><\/p>\n

thei r attention to ar t and literature, wher e fantasies are manufactured and <\/span><\/p>\n

reinforced. Ms. Friedman calls our attention to Angela Carter’s feminist <\/span><\/p>\n

rewrite of the “morning after” scene in Gone with the Wind: “Scarlett lies <\/span><\/p>\n

in bed smiling the next morning because she broke Rhett’s kneecaps the <\/span><\/p>\n

night before. And the reason that he disappeared before she awoke was <\/span><\/p>\n

to go off to Europe to visit a good kneecap specialist.”3 0 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This is meant to be amusing, but of course the point is serious. For the <\/span><\/p>\n

gender feminist believes that Margaret Mitchel l got it wrong. If Mitchell <\/span><\/p>\n

had understood better how to make a true heroine of Scarlett, she would <\/span><\/p>\n

have mad e her different. Scarlett would then have been the kind of person <\/span><\/p>\n

wh o would plainly see that Rhet t mus t be severely punished for what he <\/span><\/p>\n

had inflicted on he r the night before. More generally, the gender feminist <\/span><\/p>\n

believes she mus t rebut and replace the fiction that glorifies dominant <\/span><\/p>\n

males and the wome n wh o find them attractive. This popular literature, <\/span><\/p>\n

which “eroticizes” male dominance , mus t be opposed and, if possible, <\/span><\/p>\n

eradicated. Furthermore , the feminist establishment mus t seek ways to <\/span><\/p>\n

foster the popularity of a new genre of romantic film and fiction that <\/span><\/p>\n

sends a mor e edifying message to the wome n and men of America. A <\/span><\/p>\n

widely used textbook gives us a fair idea of what that message should be: <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Plots for nonsexist films could include wome n in traditionally male <\/span><\/p>\n

jobs (e.g. , long-distance truck driver). . . . For example, a high-<\/span><\/p>\n

ranking female Army officer, treated with respect by men and <\/span><\/p>\n

wome n alike, could be shown not only in various sexual encounters <\/span><\/p>\n

with other people but also carrying out her job in a human e manner . <\/span><\/p>\n

Or perhaps the main character could be a female urologist . She <\/span><\/p>\n

could interact with nurses and other medical personnel , diagnose <\/span><\/p>\n

illnesses brilliantly, and treat patients with great sympathy as wel l <\/span><\/p>\n

as have sex with them. Whe n the Army officer or the urologist <\/span><\/p>\n

engage in sexual activities, they will treat their partners and be <\/span><\/p>\n

treated by them in some of the considerate ways described above.3 1 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The truck driver and the urologist are meant to be serious role models <\/span><\/p>\n

for the free feminist woman , humane , forthrightly sexual , but not discrim\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

inating against either gender in her preferences for partners, so consider\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ate that all wil l respect her . These model s are projected in the hope that <\/span><\/p>\n

someday films and novels with such themes and heroines will be pre \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

ferred, replacing the currently popula r “incorrect” romances with a mor e <\/span><\/p>\n

acceptable ideal . <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It seems a futile hope . Perhaps the best way to see wha t the gender <\/span><\/p>\n

feminists are u p against is to compare their version of romance with that <\/span><\/p>\n

embodied in contemporary romance fiction that sells in the millions. Here <\/span><\/p>\n

is a typical example: <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Townsfolk called him devil. For dark and enigmatic Julian, Earl of <\/span><\/p>\n

Ravenwood, was a ma n with a legendary temper and a first wife <\/span><\/p>\n

whose mysterious death would not be forgotten. . . . Now country-<\/span><\/p>\n

bred Sophy Dorring is about to become Ravenwood’s new bride. <\/span><\/p>\n

Drawn to his masculine strength and the glitter of desire that burned <\/span><\/p>\n

in his emerald eyes, the tawny-haired lass had her own reasons for <\/span><\/p>\n

agreeing to a marriage of convenience. . . . Sophy Dorring intended <\/span><\/p>\n

to teach the devi l to love.3 2 <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Romance novels amoun t to almost 4 0 percent of all mass-market pa\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

perback sales. Harlequin Enterprises alone has sales of close to 200 mil \u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

lion books worldwide. They appear in many languages, including <\/span><\/p>\n

Japanese, Swedish, and Greek, and they are now beginning to appear in <\/span><\/p>\n

Eastern Europe. The readership is almost exclusively women.3 3 The chal\u00ad<\/span><\/p>\n

lenge this present s to gender feminist ideologues is mos t formidable since <\/span><\/p>\n

almost every hero in this fictional genre is an “alpha male” like Rhet t <\/span><\/p>\n

Butler or the Earl of Ravenwood. It was therefore to be expected that the <\/span><\/p>\n

New Feminists would make a concerted attempt to correct this literature <\/span><\/p>\n

and to replace it by a new one. <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Downloaded from here: http:\/\/bookos.org\/book\/943755\/f24cb0 http:\/\/bookos.org\/book\/693807\/58eb83   –   I came across Sommers years ago when i read her interview here: http:\/\/www.menweb.org\/paglsomm.htm   It had this bit:   MS. PAGLIA: Well, one of the things that got me pilloried from coast to coast was when I wrote a piece on date rape for Newsday in January […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1937,1879,1850],"tags":[1909,1916,1067],"class_list":["post-3945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education-science","category-education-politik","category-feminismequality","tag-feminism","tag-free-speech","tag-review","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3945"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3947,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945\/revisions\/3947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}