{"id":4029,"date":"2013-11-23T23:36:36","date_gmt":"2013-11-23T22:36:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/?p=4029"},"modified":"2022-02-03T16:26:50","modified_gmt":"2022-02-03T15:26:50","slug":"papers-about-training-effects-a-collection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/2013\/11\/papers-about-training-effects-a-collection\/","title":{"rendered":"Papers about training effects: a collection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Being tired of finding these over and over again. Posting here for posterity.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Hausknecht, John P., Charlie O. Trevor, and James L. Farr. &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Retaking-ability-tests-in-a-selection-setting-implications-for-practice-effects-training-performance-and-turnover1.pdf\">Retaking ability tests in a selection setting: Implications for practice effects, training performance, and turnover.&#8221;<\/a> Journal of Applied Psychology 87.2 (2002): 243.<\/li>\n<li>Hausknecht, John P., et al. &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Retesting-in-selection-A-meta-analysis-of-coaching-and-practice-effects-for-tests-of-cognitive-ability..pdf\">Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability.<\/a>&#8221; Journal of Applied Psychology 92.2 (2007): 373.<\/li>\n<li>te Nijenhuis, Jan, Annelies EM van Vianen, and Henk van der Flier. &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Score-gains-on-g-loaded-tests-No-g.pdf\">Score gains on g-loaded tests: No g.<\/a>&#8221; Intelligence 35.3 (2007): 283-300.<\/li>\n<li id=\"gs_cit0\">te Nijenhuis, Jan, and Henk van der Flier. &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Is-the-Flynn-effect-on-g-A-meta-analysis.pdf\">Is the Flynn effect on g?: A meta-analysis.<\/a>&#8221; <em>Intelligence<\/em> (2013).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Being tired of finding these over and over again. Posting here for posterity. Hausknecht, John P., Charlie O. Trevor, and James L. Farr. &#8220;Retaking ability tests in a selection setting: Implications for practice effects, training performance, and turnover.&#8221; Journal of Applied Psychology 87.2 (2002): 243. Hausknecht, John P., et al. &#8220;Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1839],"tags":[2017],"class_list":["post-4029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psychometics","tag-practice-effect","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4029"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10064,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4029\/revisions\/10064"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emilkirkegaard.dk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}