Skip to content
  • Main website
  • Rationalwiki / Oliver Smith
  • Archive
  • Donation options
  • In the media
  • Relation to Søren Kierkegaard?
  • About
Clear Language, Clear Mind
  • Main website
  • Rationalwiki / Oliver Smith
  • Archive
  • Donation options
  • In the media
  • Relation to Søren Kierkegaard?
  • About

Epistemology

  1. Home>
  2. Philosophy>
  3. Epistemology>
  4. Page 4

“But you don't know that you know that!”

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:26. August 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology/Multilogues
  • Post comments:0 Comments

Fast: “We need to keep in mind that "I know that I know" is ambiguous between 1) I am certain and 2) I have knowledge that I know. The latter…

Continue Reading“But you don't know that you know that!”

Induction, deduction and the lack of justification

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:23. August 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:0 Comments

It has been thought for many years (especially since Hume's first Enquiry1) that induction lacks a justification. This justification for induction, it has been thought for long, is necessarily if…

Continue ReadingInduction, deduction and the lack of justification

Human rationality

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:23. August 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:0 Comments

Induction and deduction are foundational to human rationality because it is impossible for a human to stop using them. Indeed what it means to be humanly rational is that one…

Continue ReadingHuman rationality

Definition of 'a probability'

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:6. August 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:0 Comments

A probability is something that is more than a mere logical possibility. I also think that it is stronger than a mere physical possibility (I'm a regularity theorist). Here's one…

Continue ReadingDefinition of 'a probability'

The recent controversy about Hume's Maxim against justified belief in miracles

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:9. June 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:0 Comments

Contrary to what I normally do I'm not going to argue anything in this article. My goal is to spread useful information, mostly in form of links about Hume's maxim.…

Continue ReadingThe recent controversy about Hume's Maxim against justified belief in miracles

Two kinds of certainty

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:10. May 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology

A quick explanation of two types of certainty that people tend to confuse. The first is the one we typically mean in natural language. It's called psychological certainty. It's a…

Continue ReadingTwo kinds of certainty

JTB+ and the first person perspective

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:23. February 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:1 Comment

Emil Kirkegaard I have already expanded a bit on certain problematic aspects of the JTB+ theory. In this essay I will expand on a certain methodological feature: If you're "looking"…

Continue ReadingJTB+ and the first person perspective

A quick argument for the principle of simplicity

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:19. February 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:3 Comments

Suppose there is a world where there are facts F1, F2, F3, ... Fn that need to be explained. Suppose further that someone advances an infinite amount of theories that…

Continue ReadingA quick argument for the principle of simplicity

Knowledge as a kind of belief… maybe

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:9. January 2009
  • Post category:Epistemology
  • Post comments:0 Comments

I was just discussing this over at FreeRatio.org. I made the claim, which seemed intuitively true to me, that knowledge (JTB+) is a kind of belief. This caused some controversy.…

Continue ReadingKnowledge as a kind of belief… maybe

Quote: Pyrrhonisme

  • Post author:Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
  • Post published:27. November 2008
  • Post category:Epistemology/Humor
  • Post comments:0 Comments

Tammuz: "Do you think that Pyrrhonian skepticism is warranted?" Antiplastic: "I doubt it." Source.

Continue ReadingQuote: Pyrrhonisme
  • Go to the previous page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Go to the next page
Copyright - OceanWP Theme by OceanWP