Some quick notes about a more expressive quantification logic
Towardsabetterquantitativelogic (due to formatting) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vN7pFML8N_s8HUMVmpai1rXiP1dLzeB04A9OufssEkI/edit
“The naturalistic fallacy” as used in the science literature…
“It goes without saying that our contention that beautiful people are more intelligent is purely scientific (logical and empirical); it is not a prescription for how to treat or judge…
Review and thoughts about The g Factor (Christopher Brand, 1996)
The-g-Factor-General-Intelligence-and-Its-Implications-Chris-Brand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_g_Factor:_General_Intelligence_and_Its_Implications_%28book%29 The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications is a book by Christopher Brand, a psychologist and lecturer at the University of Edinburgh. It was published by John…
Review of python book and some other thoughts
It was mentioned by TechDirt in their reporting on an absurd copyright case (so, pretty normal). The strange choice of the author to use identation to mark borders…
The redundant use of “myself”, “personally”, and perhaps others
Here's a random example [source is this book]: A database (DB) is simply a collection of data, placed into an arbitrary structured format. The most common DB is a relational…
Something about certainty, proofs in math, induction/abduction
This conversation followed me posting the post just before, and several people bringing up the same proof. Aowpwtomsihermng = Afraid of what people will think of me, so i had…
An alternative way to calculate squares.. without using multiplication
I was once at a party, and i was somewhat bored and i found this way of calculating the next square. It works without multiplication, so its suitable for mental…
Boldrin and Levine’s new paper: The Case Against Patents (2012)
I have previously talked about their book from 2008 (i think), which is mighty interesting. Not the least for me being on the board of directors for the danish pirate…
Some more stuff about KK-principle
The reason to post the other post about the KKp is that i was having a conversation with a friend about it. Turns out he is a supporter of it.…
Incomplete formal proof that the KK-principle is wrong
(KK)If one knows that p, then one knows that one knows that p. Definitions A0is the proposition that 1+1=2. A1is the proposition that Emil knows that 1+1=2. A2is the proposition…
- Go to the previous page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- …
- 21
- Go to the next page