I hav torked about raeses and intelijens/IQ/g befor and refered to Rushton and Jensen’s 2005 paeper about it. However, i reesently found a dokumentary on raes and intelijens. It is not partikularly gud but it prompted me to look a bit mor at the evidens. I diskovered that the Rushton and Jensen (2005) is aktualy the target artikl of an isue of that jurnal. I then downloeded orl the other relevant paepers in that isue of the jurnal and red them. Rather than maeking me dout their konklushons, the paepers bie the kritiks maed me mor konfident about the hereditarian theory. Their arguments ar soe bad that it maeks me wonder if thoes ar the best arguments agaenst the hereditarian theory around. I wil poest the paepers heer so the interested reeder kan see for himself.

J. Philippe Rushton, Arthur R. Jensen – THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY

Robert J. Sternberg – THERE ARE NO PUBLIC-POLICY IMPLICATIONS A Reply to Rushton and Jensen (2005)

Richard E. Nisbett – HEREDITY, ENVIRONMENT, AND RACE DIFFERENCES IN IQ A Commentary on Rushton and Jensen (2005)

Lisa Suzuki and Joshua Aronson – THE CULTURAL MALLEABILITY OF INTELLIGENCE AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RACIAL ETHNIC HIERARCHY

Linda S. Gottfredson – WHAT IF THE HEREDITARIAN HYPOTHESIS IS TRUE

J. Philippe Rushton & Arthur R. Jensen – WANTED MORE RACE REALISM, LESS MORALISTIC FALLACY

0 Comments

Leave a Reply