It works in practice, but does it work in (my) theory?

There's a certain type of person that doesn't produce any empirical contribution to "Reducing the heredity-environment uncertainty". Instead, they contribute various theoretical arguments which they take to undermine the empirical…

Continue ReadingIt works in practice, but does it work in (my) theory?

You can’t ignore gene-environment correlations when looking for gene-environment interactions

Humans love interactions, they tell interesting stories (however, no study has investigated this bias, AFAIK). However, statistics and nature hate interactions. Interactions in general have low prior, and because people…

Continue ReadingYou can’t ignore gene-environment correlations when looking for gene-environment interactions

Making better use of the scientific literature: large-scale automatic retrieval of data from published figures

Science is a set of related methods that aim at finding true patterns about the world. These methods are generally designed so as to remove noise from random circumstances (the…

Continue ReadingMaking better use of the scientific literature: large-scale automatic retrieval of data from published figures

Standard deviation of total SAT scores: not simply the sum of the standard deviations of subtests

Someone on Reddit for SlateStarCodex: AFAIK, SATs are normed to mean of 500 per section and standard deviation of 100. Assuming that math and verbal are highly correlated, that approximates…

Continue ReadingStandard deviation of total SAT scores: not simply the sum of the standard deviations of subtests

The neuroscience of intelligence: very preliminary because of power failure and lack of multivariate studies

I don't have time to provide extensive citations for this post, so some things are cited from memory. You should be able to locate the relevant literature, but otherwise just…

Continue ReadingThe neuroscience of intelligence: very preliminary because of power failure and lack of multivariate studies